Is there any other method to solve this determinant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nirajnishad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Method
nirajnishad
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Row-1...a 1 1
Row-2...1 b 1
Row-3...1 1 c

if the value of the determinant is positive
the what is abc?

Homework Equations


ans is abc>-8


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not able to follow the method shown in R D sharma Book.
Is there any other method to solve this determinant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


nirajnishad said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not able to follow the method shown in R D sharma Book.
Is there any other method to solve this determinant?


See, you just said that you are not able to follow the method in the RD Sharma book.

Now, think of this. What USEFUL INFORMATION DOES this convey?

Can you put the EXACT problem that you face in a MORE INFORMATIVE WAY?

If you allow me a guess, I assume that the determinant has been expanded into it's factors. After that, what follows is a simple application of Quadratic Expressions (WHICH YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE STUDIED!)

So, read the solution again, try and paraphrase the steps, and tell us where you face the exact problem!
 


I have used some phrases. Let me ReIterate them:

  • Useful Information Conveyed
  • Exact Problem
  • Paraphrase the steps

Now, keep this post in your notebook or somewhere. Over the next one month, try and think what these three words might mean in different situations.

Isn't it great how such small and minute things learned everyday will change you overall as a student? Sahi hai be. Keep learning!
 


AFTER EXPANDING THE DETERMINANT,

The problem reduces to finding the minimum value of abc, if abc + 2 - a - b - c > 0

Can anyone try their hands at this question? It can be done through the theory of equations!

Or is there any other method to solve this question from scratch?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top