Is there mass without momentum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter azabak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Momentum
azabak
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
There's something called "rest mass" that is the mass of a body in "rest". But since rest is relative it is impossible to surely know something's mass. We also know that mass increses with velocity, so it seems possible that mass is nothing but a "shaded" speed in a certain referential.
Share your ideas about the subject.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my bathroom I am at rest relative to myself and the scale. I thought there was a different way of looking at it that didn't require relative mass per se, but an understanding of mass-energy, objects don't get harder to accelerate due to increased mass if you say F = (mass-energy) * acceleration, then it is due to increased energy?
 
azabak said:
There's something called "rest mass" that is the mass of a body in "rest". But since rest is relative it is impossible to surely know something's mass.

The name "rest mass" is a historical artifact and can be rather misleading. Physicists nowadays prefer to use the name "invariant mass." It can always be calculated from an object's momentum and energy using

E^2 = (m_0 c^2)^2 + (pc)^2

i.e.

m_0 c^2 = \sqrt{E^2 - (pc)^2}
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top