Is There Spin-Orbital Coupling in S-Orbitals with L=0?

AI Thread Summary
Spin-orbital coupling in S-orbitals with L=0 results in no coupling, as J equals 1/2 and there is no energy splitting without an external magnetic field. Energy splitting occurs only when L>0 due to LS-coupling, allowing for multiple J values and corresponding energy differences. The nucleus's magnetic field contributes to the varying energy states associated with different LS-couplings. Phosphorescence may be explained by spin-orbit coupling, where the motion of the nucleus creates a magnetic field that interacts with the electron's spin. Overall, the interaction between the electron's spin and orbital angular momentum is crucial for understanding these quantum phenomena.
Mortendk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.
Im reading quantum chemistry due to an exam, but there are a few things, that I am not sure of:

1. I'm not sure, but as far as i understand, there is coupling between spin and orbital angular momentum, but if L = 0, in an S-orbital: is there then any coupling ?


2. Does energisplit happen without interference from an foreign magnetic field?

Hope you can help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. If L=0 then J=1/2 only as S=1/2 for an electron and so there is no splitting.

2. In the above case there would be no splitting and magnetic field would be required to
cause it (by Zeeman effect) but if L>0 then J can have more than one value and each will
have different energy due to LS-coupling so splitting will occur without magnetic field present.

---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it the nucleus' magnetic field that gives rise to the different energy states? - which makes the different LS-couplings have different energies, and futhermore makes splitting occur
 
Last edited:
Another question concerning spin-orbit coupling.

I have read that phosphorescense might be caused by spin-orbit coupling. How can that be explained?

Thanks a lot
 
In classical consideration, an electron orbits the nucleus and in electron's frame of reference it looks like the nucleus is orbiting the electron. A moving nucleus could essentially be regarded as a current loop and you can then calculate the magnetic field generated by this motion. This is how the LS-coupling arises, basically the magnetic field depends on momentum of the nucleus (L), higher momentum means more revolutions around the electron and greater current. The magnetic moment of the electron depends on its spin (S) and the usual interaction of magnetic field with a magnetic moment proportional to m.B (greek mu is usually used for m) becomes proportional to L.S where L and S are replaced with quantum operators.

---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top