Is there such a matrix operation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wolfgang2b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Wolfgang2b
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Say I have two matrices of the form

A = [1 0 0 1 0 1] (1 x 6 row vector)

and

B = [ a b c] (1 x 3 row vector). The number of elements in B = number of 1s in A.

Is there any matrix operation that could be done on A and B that would give me C = [a 0 0 b 0 c]? That is the 1's of A should be replaced with the values in B and zeros left as it is.

I am looking for operations that would not access the individual elements separately (i.e. I am not looking for things like if A(1)==1, C(1)=A(1)*b(1) etc... or inserting zeros.) I am looking for some operation like A*B that would give this result.

Sorry about the cryptic title. I can't really describe it without examples.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Wolfgang2b said:
Say I have two matrices of the form

A = [1 0 0 1 0 1]


Either this is a \,1\times 6\, matrix, which is the same as a six-coordinate row vector, or you meant something else

that I, at least, cannot imagine what it is.

and

B = [ a b c]. The number of elements in B = number of 1s in A.


The same as above. Do you know what a matrix is? You should also know we have LaTeX in this site for us all to

properly write mathematics. This would be a huge improvement in this kind of question.

DonAntonio


Is there any matrix operation that could be done on A and B that would give me C = [a 0 0 b 0 c]? That is the 1's of A should be replaced with the values in B and zeros left as it is.

I am looking for operations that would not access the individual elements separately (i.e. I am not looking for things like if A(1)==1, C(1)=A(1)*b(1) etc... or inserting zeros.) I am looking for some operation like A*B that would give this result.

Sorry about the cryptic title. I can't really describe it without examples.
 
DonAntonio said:
Either this is a \,1\times 6\, matrix, which is the same as a six-coordinate row vector, or you meant something else

that I, at least, cannot imagine what it is.

Yes, it is a 1 x 6 row vector or you can take the transpose and consider it a 6 x 1 column vector. Doesn't really matter. Same for the other matrix.
DonAntonio said:
Do you know what a matrix is? You should also know we have LaTeX in this site for us all to

properly write mathematics. This would be a huge improvement in this kind of question.

DonAntonio
I know there was a matrix with Keanu Reeves in it. Like that one actually. I also have done few problems with the matrices in math. I don't know why this is relevant here. Can't I call row vectors as matrices? I store them as matrices in Matlab and would like to do matrix operations.

I also don't see the need to write this question in LaTeX as it does not contain any complex equations that would otherwise be unintelligible. However I would do that in future questions. For now, I will update the OP.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top