Is there such a thing as lumens/m^3?Would you have to be measuring

  • Thread starter Thread starter ABHoT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring
AI Thread Summary
Lumens per cubic meter (lumens/m^3) is not a standard or meaningful unit for measuring light, as it would require assessing light from all directions simultaneously. Lumens/m^2 is a more relevant measure, focusing on perceived brightness rather than total light energy. Light that does not reach the human eye contributes zero lumens, emphasizing the importance of direct visibility. Measuring light scattered by particles in a medium, like fog, could provide a practical application for lumens/m^3. There is a query about whether there is an equivalent unit for electromagnetic energy similar to lumens/m^2, indicating a need for clarity in measuring light and energy.
ABHoT
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Is there such a thing as lumens/m^3?
Would you have to be measuring incoming light/energy from every (infinite) direction at the same time?
Can it be estimated or got from lumens/m^2?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Not really a meaningful unit. Light that moves through space without reaching a human eye has 0 lumens. Lumens/m^2 is a measure of perceived brightness.

The closest thing to making it meaningful would be to measure the light being scattered by a fog or volume of fluid. That could be described as lumens per unit volume.
 


Aha, thanks. I think I'm confusing lumens/m^2 as a measure of electromagnetic energy. Is there an equivalent to lumens/m^2 for em energy?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top