Is thermal conductivity additive for multiple layers of different materials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether thermal conductivity is additive for multiple layers of different materials. One participant suggests that the total thermal conductivity resembles the behavior of capacitors in series, implying it cannot exceed the lowest individual conductivity. Another participant counters this by comparing thermal conductivity to resistors, noting that conductivity is the inverse of resistance. They propose a formula for calculating total conductivity based on individual layer conductivities. The conversation highlights the complexity of modeling thermal conductivity in layered materials.
Xeract
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I think the answer is yes, but I just wanted to check.

If you have several sheets of different material, is the total thermal conductivity the sum of the individual thermal conductivities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're wrong. The conductivity of the laminate is more like the capacitance of capacitors in series. The total conductivity can't be more than the lowest value in the laminate.
 
I was modelling the conductivity on resistors instead of capacitors. Surely the higher the thermal conductivity the higher the "resistance" to heat flow so they should be modeled as resistors?

(I could be completely wrong on this)
 
You're right about the resistors. But conductivity is the inverse of resistance,
so the addition ( for equal thickness layers) looks like,

\frac{1}{C_{tot}} = \sum \frac{1}{C_i}

which reminds me of capacitors. I could also be wrong.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top