Is this microscope good for looking at cells and other small things?

  • Thread starter Thread starter labprofess
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope
AI Thread Summary
The microscope in question offers a maximum magnification of 2500x and includes a 3MP camera, making it suitable for observing human and plant cells, as well as other small specimens. While the specifications are impressive, concerns were raised about the mechanical stability of the microscope, which could affect high-magnification imaging due to potential vibrations and backlash in the z-stage. The standard quality of the objectives is uncertain, although replacements are available at low cost. Additionally, the lack of phase contrast or darkfield capabilities limits its effectiveness for unstained specimens. Overall, it is considered a good choice for stained samples but may not perform well with untreated materials.
labprofess
Hi all

So I am planning to save up for this microscope because I am trying to 'upgrade' from my microscope whos max magnification is 1000x (keep in mind Its not clear at max the highest it would be a good image at is 500x)
http://www.amscope.com/40x-2500x-le...d-microscope-w-3d-stage-1-3mp-usb-camera.html

This is exactly a microscope I am searching for, correct magnification and camera but anyone ever used this? Is it a good microscope? And how is it at the max magnification?

(Not sure if important but mostly going to look at cells (human cells and plant cells) and other small things (sperm,etc.)

Thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I never used this microscope but I just looked at the list of specs and I am impressed. The x2500 magnification is quite impressive and with half price discount, I would say this is a very successful choice. For your planned use, this will be an excellent choice. Good luck and let me know how it goes once you use it.
 
They also sell a 3MP camera. I would highly suggest getting the upgraded camera.

BoB
 
SciencewithDrJ said:
I never used this microscope but I just looked at the list of specs and I am impressed. The x2500 magnification is quite impressive and with half price discount, I would say this is a very successful choice. For your planned use, this will be an excellent choice. Good luck and let me know how it goes once you use it.

will do
 
labprofess said:
Hi all

So I am planning to save up for this microscope because I am trying to 'upgrade' from my microscope whos max magnification is 1000x (keep in mind Its not clear at max the highest it would be a good image at is 500x)
http://www.amscope.com/40x-2500x-le...d-microscope-w-3d-stage-1-3mp-usb-camera.html

This is exactly a microscope I am searching for, correct magnification and camera but anyone ever used this? Is it a good microscope? And how is it at the max magnification?

(Not sure if important but mostly going to look at cells (human cells and plant cells) and other small things (sperm,etc.)

Thanks!

I like that it has a substage condenser, with the ability to align and focus the condenser lens, and I like the use of LED illumination. However, I suspect the microscope and stage itself aren't sufficiently mechanically stiff- vibrations will severely impact your ability to perform high-magnification imaging. Also, the z-stage will possibly have a lot of backlash, making fine focusing a headache.

The objectives all seem very 'standard', it's unclear what their quality is. The good news is that you can get replacements that will work better for very little money on ebay.
 
Looks like this is a very reasonably priced microscope, however I would expect it to only be very useful for looking at stained section, or things already colored like blood smears on slides.

It does not have (as far as I can tell) any phase contrast of darkfield capabilities. It would therefore not be too useful for looking at unstained material, many aspects of which are revealed through phase contrast or darkfield illumination. This rules out looking at things like pondwater without some kind of treatment.

I am not sure how well these higher magnification lenses would work with using oil immersion lenses, which they don't appear to be. They may just produce kinda blurry images.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top