Is This Particle Accelerator Design Effective and Viable?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the viability of a proposed ion accelerator design that utilizes a constant DC power supply and pairs of plates to accelerate electrons. Critics argue that the design lacks effective acceleration due to the negligible electric field outside the plate pairs, as dictated by Gauss' law. The conversation references established methods used in linear accelerators, such as SLAC, which employ alternating fields to continuously accelerate particles. The design's reliance on a static configuration raises concerns about achieving the necessary acceleration without the dynamic switching of polarities. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that the proposed design may not be effective for practical particle acceleration.
papernuke
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I've attached a picture of an ion accelerator design I just though of.

The power source can be any constant DC supply; the voltage X would only be limited by the breakdown voltage of the gap at a given pressure.
The pairs of plates are close enough together and large enough that the E field outside a pair of plates is near negligible.
The number of plates is arbitrary; I just chose to draw 5

Would this be an effective design? Would it work at all?
 

Attachments

  • particle accelerator design.jpg
    particle accelerator design.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org
papernuke said:
I've attached a picture of an ion accelerator design I just though of.

The power source can be any constant DC supply; the voltage X would only be limited by the breakdown voltage of the gap at a given pressure.
The pairs of plates are close enough together and large enough that the E field outside a pair of plates is near negligible.
The number of plates is arbitrary; I just chose to draw 5

Would this be an effective design? Would it work at all?

I think it would NOT work, papernuke. Have a look at how the SLAC (google it) linear charged particle accelerator works:

"Linear high-energy accelerators use a linear array of plates (or drift tubes) to which an alternating high-energy field is applied. As the particles approach a plate they are accelerated towards it by an opposite polarity charge applied to the plate. As they pass through a hole in the plate, the polarity is switched so that the plate now repels them and they are now accelerated by it towards the next plate. Normally a stream of "bunches" of particles are accelerated, so a carefully controlled AC voltage is applied to each plate to continuously repeat this process for each bunch.
As the particles approach the speed of light the switching rate of the electric fields becomes so high that they operate at radio frequencies, and so microwave cavities are used in higher energy machines instead of simple plates."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_accelerator#Electrostatic_particle_accelerators
 
Thanks for the reply!

Yeah, I have read about how SLAC and other oscillating particle accelerators work. They make their plates' polarities switch at radio frequencies to match the speed of the oncoming electrons, but that's completely different from my design.

The point of what I drew up was to eliminate the need for RF polarity switching. Why wouldn't it work, though? As electrons pass in between plate pairs, they should be accelerated, and when they're outside of a plate pair, that plate pair should have no effect on the electrons.
 
papernuke, imagine an electron (negatively charged) approaching a negatively charged plate. What force do you think it would feel? Now, imagine an electron moving away from a positively charged plate. What force do you think it would feel?

I can't locate any net or additive acceleration of the electron in this scheme. Maybe I'm missing something due to my very old age, so I remain open to serious corrective evidence.
 
But outside of any given pair of charged plates, Gauss' law shows that the electric field should be zero (or near zero), because
Qenclosed = (charge on + plate)+(charge on - plate) = 0

So outside of a pair of plates, the electron should feel no forces from that pair
 
papernuke said:
But outside of any given pair of charged plates, Gauss' law shows that the electric field should be zero (or near zero), because
Qenclosed = (charge on + plate)+(charge on - plate) = 0

So outside of a pair of plates, the electron should feel no forces from that pair

So, no force means no acceleration.
 
papernuke said:
I've attached a picture of an ion accelerator design I just though of.

The power source can be any constant DC supply; the voltage X would only be limited by the breakdown voltage of the gap at a given pressure.
The pairs of plates are close enough together and large enough that the E field outside a pair of plates is near negligible.
The number of plates is arbitrary; I just chose to draw 5

Would this be an effective design? Would it work at all?

So what is it that you are trying to accomplish here? If you just want to show "acceleration", then doing a single capacitor-type arrangement is sufficient.

If you are trying to show that you can achieve the same type of acceleration as an RF structure, then you need to think again WHY we use an RF structure rather than a DC structure (hint: to get the same acceleration as an RF structure, you will need a significantly-longer DC structure).

Zz.
 
papernuke said:
But outside of any given pair of charged plates, Gauss' law shows that the electric field should be zero (or near zero), because
Qenclosed = (charge on + plate)+(charge on - plate) = 0

So outside of a pair of plates, the electron should feel no forces from that pair
This can be true if you have just two plates. But you have more - and you force those plates to be at the same potential by connecting them via wires. Instead of fixing the charge, you fix the potential.
The flaw is easier to see in terms of potentials: The difference between the first plate and the last one is just X eV.
 
Back
Top