Is This the Correct Method to Solve a Kinetics Problem Using Half-Life Formula?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a kinetics problem using the half-life formula, specifically for second-order reactions where the concentrations of reactants A and B are equal. Participants question the application of the half-life formula, suggesting that the initial concentrations should be clarified for accurate calculations. It is noted that the formula used may not be appropriate for second-order kinetics, and a recommendation is made to derive solutions from first principles. The importance of understanding the relationship between concentrations and reaction rates is emphasized, particularly how halving concentrations affects the total rate. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying half-life concepts in kinetics problems.
sidt36
Messages
36
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2016-5-22_14-46-0.png


Homework Equations


Is the question asking the concentration when the system has reached its half life
Can use the half life formula?[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



So

1/cT + 1/co = kt

1/(4 *10-2) + 1/x = k(half life time)

Is this the right approach

Please help me as this is the first time I am attempting Kinetics problems[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question is slightly ambiguous. I guess, but it is not explicitly stated, that the initial concentrations of A and B are the same.

So then you have in practice second order kinetics with respect to A, for there A = B at all times. So practically you would have the second or the kinetics with respect to A (or B).

There is a formula for half-life with second order kinetics but I don't think it's the one you have used.

Best to try and work this out from first principles. Then look it up in any case. That is the second part of this test. But the first part – knowing that this was what you had to do was the more important olympiadic part.

I never remember very well this formula - reason is there is not commonly all that much use for it outside of Olympiadics, at least in my experience. I just remember there is such a formula, and can always work it out from first principles.
 
Well I Have a solution with some logic (...)
R α CA CB

When we half each concentration the Total rate falls by ¼
So the answer should be 1×102
 
Yes that is a good way to reason.

Notice that it did depend on the initial [A] = [ B](10-2 btw).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top