Is this why relativity and quantum physics don't mix?

least_action
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
In one of Feynmans messenger lectures he proved that relativity implies local conservation of energy using the lagrangian (energy can't jump from one place to another). In the atom of quantum theory the electron jumps around in various discrete orbits. This seems like a contradiction.

Is this 'the' problem with unifying relativity and quantum theory? What other problems are there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it has something to do with "renormalization" which is used in Quantum Mechanics to make answers reasonable (basically), but when you try to "renormalize" a gravity meadiator (such as a Graviton) the equations fail.

Also in places at the quantum scale, but with huge gravity (like in a black hole) the equations also give infinate answers and stupid results.
 
No, all quantum therories are "relativistic" which means the same kind of Ponciare symmetry is designed in from the beginning.
 
least_action said:
In the atom of quantum theory the electron jumps around in various discrete orbits.

No, it doesn't. There no electron "orbits" in the classical sense. Instead, there are probability distributions which have different shapes for each energy state, but which overlap each other significantly. See for example

http://www.phy.davidson.edu/stuhome/cabell_f/density.html
 
jtbell said:
No, it doesn't. There no electron "orbits" in the classical sense. Instead, there are probability distributions which have different shapes for each energy state, but which overlap each other significantly. See for example

http://www.phy.davidson.edu/stuhome/cabell_f/density.html

Oh okay so there are not orbits but energy levels, Schrodinger said:

"... It reminds a physicist of quantum theory - no intermediate energies occurring between two neighbouring energy levels. ... The mutations are actually caused by a quantum jump in the gene molecule."

and it is this idea of a jump between energy levels which I think contradicts the theorem Feynman wrote about the Lagrangian.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top