mmmchicken
- 9
- 0
Because it takes time to get from one point to another?
It also takes time when you don't move. Dimension means that one cannot be converted into another. You could replace time by velocity (preferably that of light in a vacuum), but you cannot replace length by time or vice versa.mmmchicken said:Because it takes time to get from one point to another?
How can there be time with no movement? There's nothing to measure?fresh_42 said:It also takes time when you don't move. Dimension means that one cannot be converted into another. You could replace time by velocity (preferably that of light in a vacuum), but you cannot replace length by time or vice versa.
Your heartbeat measures time. An atomic clock measures time, and it doesn't move at all (relative to the Earth's surface).mmmchicken said:How can there be time with no movement? There's nothing to measure?
Why isn't this preferred?jack476 said:Basically, yes. We can hypothetically set up a coordinate system where three of the axes represent locations in space and an additional axis represents a "location" in time. That gives rise to the notion of the interval, the separation in both space and time, which unlike spatial separation is not observed to be different by observers with different velocities.
not measuring but confirmingfresh_42 said:Your heartbeat measures time. An atomic clock measures time, and it doesn't move at all (relative to the Earth's surface).