Is time still affected (slowed down) at the center of the earth?

goldk
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Assumptions:

1. Gravity at the center of the Earth is zero.
2. Time is slower on the surface of the Earth with respect to time in empty space (far away)

Is time still affected (slowed down) at the center of the earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's slower than at the surface. Gravitational time dilation relates to the gravitational potential, not the gravitational field.
 
Fascinating! So, can I assume the time dilation is actually at it's greatest at the exact center of mass?
 
goldk said:
Fascinating! So, can I assume the time dilation is actually at it's greatest at the exact center of mass?

Yes, gravitational time dilation is strongest at the center.
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...

Similar threads

Back
Top