Is V = xy the correct potential function for this geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter satchmo05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining if V = xy is the correct potential function for a specified geometry between conducting plates with relative permittivity εr = 3.0. Participants highlight the importance of verifying that the function satisfies Laplace's equation and the relevant boundary conditions. It is confirmed that the Laplacian of V equals zero, which is necessary but not sufficient alone for it to be a valid solution. The boundary conditions V(0,y)=0, V(x,0)=0, V(1,y)=1, and V(x,1)=1 must also be satisfied to conclude that V = xy is the correct potential function. The conversation emphasizes the need for both mathematical verification and physical relevance in potential function solutions.
satchmo05
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether or not V = xy is the correct potential function for the geometry shown in the figure: http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/446/48401266.jpg for the region 0 < x< 1 and 0 < y < 1. Why or why not? Assume that the region between the conducting plates has a relative permittivity of εr = 3.0.

Image for problem shown at this URL: http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/446/48401266.jpg

Homework Equations


There are multiple equations for the potential function V. I do not know which one to use/how to use it.


The Attempt at a Solution


Don't really know to get started on this one. I would appreciate any help that you can provide. I just need to know how to get started. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're testing whether or not the trial function obeys laplace's equation with the correct boundary conditions.
 
Ah, that makes sense Mindscape. Thank you. Ok, so I have determined that del^2(V) does in fact equal 0. What does this tell me? Is it the correct potential function? By the uniqueness principle, can I conclude that V=xy is the only potential function for this design, given the boundary conditions?
 
You also need to check the boundary conditions for V(x,y):

V(0,y)=0
V(x,0)=0
V(1,y)=1
V(x,1)=1
 
I thought there were 2 criteria though for determining whether or not a given potential function is the solution the DiffEQ. I have already determined that the Laplacian holds true, what is the other?
 
Well, if you're going to guess a solution, you'd better make sure that it satisfies the PDE to start with, and secondly that it satisfies the actual physical conditions when all is said and done.

V(x,y)=5x+7y

is that a solution? Why or why not?

Do you know how to find the solution from scratch if you had to? Maybe that would help you understand a little better.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top