Is wave function a probability function of time?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the wave function in quantum mechanics, specifically whether it can be considered a probability function of time. Participants explore various forms and definitions of wave functions, their dependence on time, and their relationship to Schrödinger's equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the wave function can be defined as a time-dependent probability function, proposing a specific form for Ψ(x,t).
  • Another participant argues that wave functions must satisfy Schrödinger's equation, indicating that the proposed form may not be valid.
  • A third participant references the conservation of probability, providing a mathematical expression that wave functions must obey.
  • One participant introduces a hypothetical function Ψ(t)=2t and poses a question about calculating the probability of finding a particle within a specified interval.
  • Another participant challenges the validity of the proposed function, stating it must be square integrable and noting the focus on non-relativistic single-particle quantum theory.
  • There are inquiries about whether the proposed functions can be transformed into valid wave functions, with responses emphasizing the need to derive them from the Hamiltonian and solve Schrödinger's equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and form of wave functions, with no consensus reached on the validity of the proposed functions or their definitions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific forms of wave functions and their time dependence.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the definitions of wave functions, their mathematical properties, and the requirement to adhere to Schrödinger's equation. The discussion also emphasizes the focus on non-relativistic quantum mechanics.

Quarlep
Messages
257
Reaction score
4
Wave function ψ(x,t) is a fuction of probability which depends on time example
Ψ(x,t)=1/(c-v)t Let's suppose its a function of probability
It depends on time and it affects space.
Is this is a definition of wave function ?
(I know wave function squuared gives probability but I am not asking that )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave function has to be a solution of Schrödinger's equation, and that restricts it to one particular form of time dependency. The ##\Psi## that you propose above won't work, as you'll see if you try plugging it into Schrödinger's equation.

In elementary (meaning before the Hilbert space formalism is introduced) quantum mechanics the wave function can be written as a function of position and time, or as a function of momentum and time. You can transform between the two forms; the former is used to calculate the probability of finding the particle at a given position at a given time and the latter to calculate the probability of finding the particle with a given momentum at a given time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
If i remember well all the wavefunctions must obey to the conservation of probability:
##\nabla j(x,t)+\frac{\partial \rho (x,t)}{\partial t}=0##
where:
##j(x,t)=-\frac{i \hbar}{2m}(\psi * \nabla \psi - \psi \nabla \psi*)##
##\rho(x,t)=|\psi|^2##
 
Lets suppose there a space-time function (simple coordinate function, depends time) Ψ(t)=2t
Let's make a problem; The probability of finding particle on the line between zero and t intervals
Line length 0 and 2t than what's the probability of finding particle between this intervels ?
Can we solve it useing wavefunction
 
That's not a valid wave function either, because it must be square integrable (also be aware that we discuss only non-relativistic single-particle quantum theory here).
 
Can I turn it a wavefunction someway but same logic
 
Quarlep said:
Can I turn it a wavefunction someway but same logic

No. You have to write down the Hamiltonian of the system, then you have to insert that Hamiltonian into Schrödinger's equation and solve for the wavefunction.
 
If I do that ,can I find the right answer ? I want to be sure sorry but thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K