Is Weapons Engineering Ethically Justifiable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter admiralmurf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering Ethics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ethical implications of pursuing a career in weapons engineering. The original poster believes that their involvement could improve existing technologies and argues that someone else would fill their role if they chose not to pursue it. Critics counter that the ethical considerations should focus on the intended use of weapons and question the validity of the original poster's reasoning. They emphasize the need for a clearer personal stance on the ethics of weapon development rather than relying on external opinions. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of ethics in the field of weapons engineering.
admiralmurf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently doing my Physics BSc and I'm thinking about my future job. So far, I've decided that I would like to go to the U.S. and do a Masters in Mechanical Engineering, and then become a weapons engineer.

Generally, this is met by people telling me I would be a killer, and shouldn't follow this career path. I personally feel that this is not ethically wrong. I feel this way due to a number of reasons. Firstly, I'm sure someone else would take my place if I didn't get this job. Furthermore, I feel as though my presence could only improve what already exists, whereas my absence (or perhaps the absence of all weapons engineers) could only lead to what already exists remaining, which includes missiles, bombs and firearms.

I would really appreciate hearing from other people with an opinion on this, with perhaps some other arguments for each side.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

The argument that someone else would do it if you didn't has nothing to do with ethics. The ethics comes from your personal beliefs about what the weapons are used for, ie, defense of your country.
 
admiralmurf said:
Generally, this is met by people telling me I would be a killer, and shouldn't follow this career path.

Does this bother you (It appears that it does, or that you're wondering if it should)? If so, why are you concerned with what other people think?

admiralmurf said:
Firstly, I'm sure someone else would take my place if I didn't get this job.

Weak sauce. As stated by Russ, it has nothing to do with ethics.

admiralmurf said:
Furthermore, I feel as though my presence could only improve what already exists, whereas my absence (or perhaps the absence of all weapons engineers) could only lead to what already exists remaining, which includes missiles, bombs and firearms.

OK. So why are you concerned with advancement of weapons technology?

You haven't stated anything you really think about weapons/weapons technology yet, much less made an ethical argument. Try stating what you think before asking for others to tell you what you want to hear.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top