Is Work Done by Gravity Equal to Change in Potential Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hb20007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Sliding
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between work done by gravity and changes in potential energy, particularly when considering angles in motion. It is clarified that while the formula W = mgh applies when the motion is vertical, for angled situations, the work done must account for the angle using W = Fd cos θ. The confusion arises when determining whether the work done by gravity is positive or negative, as this affects the change in potential energy. The conclusion is that the change in potential energy is equal to the negative of the work done by gravity, which clarifies why certain options in the problem were deemed false. Understanding these relationships is crucial for correctly solving problems involving gravitational forces and energy.
hb20007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It's in the picture attached...

Homework Equations



None...

The Attempt at a Solution



I picked options 2, 5 and 7 to be true but 2 turned out to be false. I can't figure out why it's wrong and an explanation would be appreciated. I mean it makes sense to me because work done by gravity is F*s which is (m*g)*h which is the same as the formula for gravitational potential energy, U = mgh
 

Attachments

  • Which Statements are True.jpg
    Which Statements are True.jpg
    25.6 KB · Views: 396
Physics news on Phys.org
i assume that you were using W=mgh and U=mgh? this is only correct when it is vertical, but since there is an angle θ, you need to use that other Work equation (W=Fdcos θ) which means that potential energy is not the same as Work. again, that would only be true if it were vertical such as a raindrop.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Got it. Thanks
 
Another Question !

Eagle's Wings said:
i assume that you were using W=mgh and U=mgh? this is only correct when it is vertical, but since there is an angle θ, you need to use that other Work equation (W=Fdcos θ) which means that potential energy is not the same as Work. again, that would only be true if it were vertical such as a raindrop.

I was thinking of applying this logic to a pendulum situation.

Let's say the pendulum is in motion and is at a certain moment in time at an angle of 45° to the vertical. I know that the work done by the tension is 0 as it's tangential to the direction of motion. What about the work done by gravity until the point where the pendulum is vertical?

Is it mgh or mgh*sin θ? I think it's just mgh because the equation for work done by gravity was given to me as mg(L-L*cos θ) where L = Length of string at that moment in time and it follows that (L-L*cos θ) is = h.

If it indeed is mgh, then it looks like we have assumed that the force of gravity only does work in the downwards direction. As tension does no work, what force does work in the direction of motion??
 
hb20007 said:
I picked options 2, 5 and 7 to be true but 2 turned out to be false. I can't figure out why it's wrong and an explanation would be appreciated. I mean it makes sense to me because work done by gravity is F*s which is (m*g)*h which is the same as the formula for gravitational potential energy, U = mgh
Pay careful attention to the wording of option 2. When the block slides down, is the work done by gravity positive or negative? Is the change in potential energy positive or negative?
 
Eagle's Wings said:
i assume that you were using W=mgh and U=mgh? this is only correct when it is vertical, but since there is an angle θ, you need to use that other Work equation (W=Fdcos θ) which means that potential energy is not the same as Work. again, that would only be true if it were vertical such as a raindrop.
Note that h = d cosθ, so the two expressions for work are equivalent.
 
Doc Al said:
Note that h = d cosθ, so the two expressions for work are equivalent.

Oh. Does this mean that Eagle's answer was wrong and that the reason answer 2 is false is not because the formula of work is not mgh as Eagle argued but because change in potential energy is equal to - (work done by gravity) and not equal to work done by gravity itself?
 
hb20007 said:
Oh. Does this mean that Eagle's answer was wrong and that the reason answer 2 is false is not because the formula of work is not mgh as Eagle argued but because change in potential energy is equal to - (work done by gravity) and not equal to work done by gravity itself?
Yes.
 
Back
Top