Is Work Negative When the Force is Opposite Direction of Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Work is considered negative when the force applied is in the opposite direction of the motion, indicating that the system is doing the work rather than the external environment. The formula for work, W = -∫PdV, highlights that positive work occurs when the environment does work on the system, while negative work occurs when the system performs work on itself. In a quasistatic constant pressure process, if the system expands (Vb > Va), it does negative work, while if it contracts (Vb < Va), the environment does positive work on the system. Practical examples illustrate this concept, such as lifting a book (positive work) versus catching a ball (negative work). Understanding these principles clarifies the distinction between work done by and on a system.
shravan
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
can anybody tell when work done is negative ? and when it is negative why it is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the formula for work

W = -(integral)PdV

This refers to the external work done on the system, not the work done by the system(this is what used to confuse me).

If the work is positive, this means that the external environment is doing work on the system. When the work is negative, this means that the external environment is doing negative work, thus the system is actually doing the work.
Say a system undergoes a quasistatic constant pressure process where Va changes to Vb(we assume this is not free expansion, why?). If Vb>Va, the system has expanded. In this case, the environment did not do the work, the system did it in order to expand itself, right? So, the work must be negative by sign convention(as i said, the Work refers to the amount of work done by the external environment on the system). If Vb<Va, the system has shrunk. It is clear that in this case the environment is doing work on the system to cause its volume to shrink, so the equation for work gives a positive value(since (integral)dV is -'ve).

To put it simply:
Work < 0 => work done by system
Work > 0 => work done on system
 
If the exerted force is opposite the direction of motion, then the work is negative. If the force is in the direction of motion it is positive.

Examples:
If I lift a book upwards against gravity I`m exerting a force upwards in the direction of motion, so the work done is positive (and equal to the potential energy the book gains).

If I catch a ball coming towards me I exert a force in the opposite direction of the motion of the ball, so the work done is negative (and again equal to the change in energy. In this case, the change in kinetic energy and is negative).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top