Is x=0 a solution to the inequality above?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rectifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    inequality
AI Thread Summary
The inequality \(x + \frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \geq 12\) is only defined for \(x > 0\) since \(\sqrt{x}\) is not real for \(x \leq 0\). To prove the inequality holds for positive \(x\), the function \(f(x) = x + \frac{16}{\sqrt{x}}\) must be minimized. The critical point occurs at \(x = 4\), where \(f(4) = 12\), indicating that this is the minimum value of \(f(x)\) for \(x > 0\). Thus, the inequality is satisfied for all \(x > 0\), confirming that \(x = 0\) is not a solution. The conclusion is that the only valid solutions to the inequality are for \(x > 0\).
Rectifier
Gold Member
Messages
313
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


$$x+\frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \geq 12$$

How do I show that only x>0 satisfies the inequality above.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have not made a lot of progress here. I tried the following:
$$x+\frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} - 12 \geq 0$$

I tried to multiply with $$ \sqrt{x} $$ but i am not sure wether that is allowed or not.

I am stuck here :,(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rectifier said:

Homework Statement


$$x+\frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \geq 12$$

How do I show that only x>0 satisfies the inequality above.

Is the expression on the left side defined for x≤0?
 
  • Like
Likes Rectifier
ehild said:
Is the expression on the left side defined for x≤0?

I don't think so. There were no additional information in the problem so i suppose that we should use real numbers. And thus for ##\sqrt{x}## to be > 0 the x should be more that 0. Am I right? Was that problem that easy? :O
 
Last edited:
Rectifier said:
I don't think so. There were no additional information in the problem so i suppose that we should use real numbers. And thus for $\sqrt{x}$ to be > 0 the x should be 0 or more. Am I right? Was that problem that easy? :O
For ##\sqrt{x}## to be > 0, x should be definitely greater then zero. You can not divide by zero!
That is not the solution yet, only a condition x must satisfy. You have to show for what positive x values the inequality is valid. You can introduce a new variable z=√x, arrange the inequality in the form f(z)≥0 and try to factorize f(z), by finding the roots. (They are simple integers :smile: )
 
  • Like
Likes Rectifier
ehild said:
For ##\sqrt{x}## to be > 0, x should be definitely greater then zero. You can not divide by zero!
That is not the solution yet, only a condition x must satisfy. You have to show for what positive x values the inequality is valid. You can introduce a new variable z=√x, arrange the inequality in the form f(z)≥0 and try to factorize f(z), by finding the roots. (They are simple integers :smile: )

Thank you for your help.

I have set ## z=\sqrt{x} ##

$$z^2+\frac{16}{z} \geq 12 $$

$$z^2+\frac{16}{z} -12 \geq 0 $$

And I get stuck :,(
 
Rectifier said:

Homework Statement


$$x+\frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \geq 12$$

How do I show that only x>0 satisfies the inequality above.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have not made a lot of progress here. I tried the following:
$$x+\frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} - 12 \geq 0$$

I tried to multiply with $$ \sqrt{x} $$ but i am not sure wether that is allowed or not.

I am stuck here :,(

Minimize the function ##f(x) = x + 16/\sqrt{x}## in the region ##x > 0##. What do you get?
 
Rectifier said:
I don't think so. There were no additional information in the problem so i suppose that we should use real numbers. And thus for ##\sqrt{x}## to be > 0 the x should be more that 0. Am I right? Was that problem that easy? :O

NO, not necessarily: what is stopping ##x + 16/\sqrt{x}## from being < 12 for some ##x> 0##? You need to show that cannot happen!
 
Ray Vickson said:
Minimize the function ##f(x) = x + 16/\sqrt{x}## in the region ##x > 0##. What do you get?
Alright, then:
$$ f(x)=x+ \frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \\ f'(x)=1- \frac{8}{x^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\ 0=1- \frac{8}{x^{3}{2}} \\ x=4 $$

I am afraid that I don't know how that x=4 is going to make my life easier :D
 
Rectifier said:
Alright, then:
$$ f(x)=x+ \frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \\ f'(x)=1- \frac{8}{x^{\frac{3}{2}}} \\ 0=1- \frac{8}{x^{3}{2}} \\ x=4 $$

I am afraid that I don't know how that x=4 is going to make my life easier :D

Yes, but knowing that ##f(4)## is the smallest possible of ##f(x)## in the region ##x > 0## is valuable information, especially since evaluating ##f(4)## is not very hard.
 
  • Like
Likes Rectifier
  • #10
Ray Vickson said:
Yes, but knowing that ##f(4)## is the smallest possible of ##f(x)## in the region ##x > 0## is valuable information, especially since evaluating ##f(4)## is not very hard.
How can I use that value to solve the problem? :D I am sorry if I am being slow on this one.
 
  • #11
Rectifier said:
How can I use that value to solve the problem? :D I am sorry if I am being slow on this one.
The interesting thing here is that i get 12 if I try to calculate f(4). This means that 12 is the lowest value the function can have for x>0!
 
  • #12
Rectifier said:
The interesting thing here is that i get 12 if I try to calculate f(4). This means that 12 is the lowest value the function can have for x>0!

Exactly: so you have proved the statement they asked you to prove!
 
  • Like
Likes Rectifier
  • #13
Ray Vickson said:
Exactly: so you have proved the statement they asked you to prove!
Yey! :D
Oh gosh I am so appy now. I have been sitting with this one for about a day now. Thank you Ray and thank you ehild! :D
 
  • #14
Rectifier said:

Homework Statement


$$x+\frac{16}{\sqrt{x}} \geq 12$$

How do I show that only x>0 satisfies the inequality above ?
I don't see that this original question was answered.

ehild did try to lead you to the answer.

Suppose that x < 0, i.e. x is negative.

What is ##\ \sqrt{-4\,}\ ## ?
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
I don't see that this original question was answered.

ehild did try to lead you to the answer.

Suppose that x < 0, i.e. x is negative.

What is ##\ \sqrt{-4\,}\ ## ?

2i
 
  • #16
Rectifier said:
2i
IGNORE

Of course that's not a real number.

Oh SNAP !

I see you did answer this in Post #3 .
 
Last edited:
  • #17
SammyS said:
I don't see that this original question was answered.

ehild did try to lead you to the answer.

Suppose that x < 0, i.e. x is negative.

What is ##\ \sqrt{-4\,}\ ## ?

I think the question was somewhat weirdly stated. Certainly, the inequality makes no sense at all if ##x < 0##, but for ##x > 0## there is still a non-trivial issue to prove, viz., that ##f(x) \geq 12\; \forall \, x > 0##.
 
  • #18
With the notation z=√x, the original inequality can be written as z3-12z+16 ≥ 0. In order to factorize the left side, we try to find one root. As the coefficients are all integer, it is possible that integer root exist, one among the dividers of 16. 1 is not a root, but 2 is, and -4 also. So the inequality can be written as (z-2)2(z+4) ≥ 0
Knowing that z>0, is there any value of z so that the product (z-2)2(z+4) becomes negative?
 
  • #19
Rectifier said:
The interesting thing here is that i get 12 if I try to calculate f(4). This means that 12 is the lowest value the function can have for x>0!
You've only shown x=4 is a critical point so far. For completeness, you should show that f(4) is a minimum.
 
  • #20
ehild said:
With the notation z=√x, the original inequality can be written as z3-12z+16 ≥ 0. In order to factorize the left side, we try to find one root. As the coefficients are all integer, it is possible that integer root exist, one among the dividers of 16. 1 is not a root, but 2 is, and -4 also. So the inequality can be written as (z-2)2(z+4) ≥ 0
Knowing that z>0, is there any value of z so that the product (z-2)2(z+4) becomes negative?
why is it ok to multiply with z when going from:
## z^2+ \frac{16}{z} - 12 \geq 0 ##
to
## z^3+16-12z ≥ 0 ## ?

Thought:
We know that z>0 right now. So I guess that it is allowed. But what if z could be z<0 or perhaps even z=0 (thats not the case this time) but what if? :)

I am sorry if I am going slightly off-topic.
 
  • #21
Rectifier said:
why is it ok to multiply with z when going from:
## z^2+ \frac{16}{z} - 12 \geq 0 ##
to
## z^3+16-12z ≥ 0 ## ?

Thought:
We know that z>0 right now. So I guess that it is allowed. But what if z could be z<0 or perhaps even z=0 (that's not the case this time) but what if? :)

I am sorry if I am going slightly off-topic.
There are a number of methods to handle this.

Other methods can be quicker, but the most general method is to consider the possible cases:

If z > 0 : then ...

If z < 0 : then ...

(Of course, z ≠ 0 for examples like this.)
 
  • #22
Rectifier said:
why is it ok to multiply with z when going from:
## z^2+ \frac{16}{z} - 12 \geq 0 ##
to
## z^3+16-12z ≥ 0 ## ?

Thought:
We know that z>0 right now. So I guess that it is allowed. But what if z could be z<0 or perhaps even z=0 (thats not the case this time) but what if? :)

I am sorry if I am going slightly off-topic.
Z can not be zero as it is in the denominator.
If z may be negative you have to discuss both cases. In case it is negative and you multiply with it, the inequality will change: ## z^3+16-12z ≤ 0 ## , that is, (z-2)2(z+4)≤0, that can happen if ? So ## z^2+ \frac{16}{z} - 12 \geq 0 ## is satisfied by z from two intervals.
 
Back
Top