Is Z[1/5] a PID? Analysis and Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter eok20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pid
eok20
Messages
198
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine if Z[1/5] is a PID (Z is the ring of integers).



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure...I tried showing that it isn't by showing that it is not a UFD but that didn't work out well. Maybe there is some way I can show it is a PID by showing it's a Euclidean domain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it or isn't it? Usually you would try to show it isn't, which you did, without success, so maybe it is. Another clue: what are the easiest examples (in your book or notes) of integral domains that are not PID's? Are they more complicated than Z[1/5]? I bet they are. So that's a clue that this one is.

Try to show it is. I would just try to show it directly. Two hints. First, what do elements of Z[1/5] look like? Second, how do you even show (directly) that Z is a PID?
 
Billy Bob said:
Is it or isn't it? Usually you would try to show it isn't, which you did, without success, so maybe it is. Another clue: what are the easiest examples (in your book or notes) of integral domains that are not PID's? Are they more complicated than Z[1/5]? I bet they are. So that's a clue that this one is.

Try to show it is. I would just try to show it directly. Two hints. First, what do elements of Z[1/5] look like? Second, how do you even show (directly) that Z is a PID?

Thanks for the reply and hints! I was able to prove it directly without too much trouble: take an ideal I in Z[1/5]. Intersecting it with Z gives an ideal in Z, which is generated by some p in Z (since Z is a PID). Its easy to show that p generates I by taking an element r in I, multiplying by 5^N for some N to clear denominators so 5^N*r is in I intersect Z (so 5^N*r=kp). Then r = 5^(-N)kp is in the ideal generated by p.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top