Isotope Half-Life and Sample Size Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter AryRezvani
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Isotope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the initial size of a sample of the isotope 239Pu, which has a half-life of 24,100 years. After 10,000 years, the sample is reduced by 1.6 grams. The equation used is A = Ao * e^(-rt), where A represents the remaining amount, Ao is the initial amount, r is the decay constant, and t is time. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly manipulating the equation and understanding the role of the half-life in determining the decay constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and natural logarithms
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of the decay constant calculation from half-life
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the decay constant from half-life using the formula r = ln(2) / half-life
  • Explore the application of the exponential decay formula in real-world scenarios
  • Study the implications of negative exponents in exponential functions
  • Practice solving similar problems involving isotope decay and sample size calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, educators teaching radioactive decay, and anyone involved in nuclear science or environmental studies related to isotopes.

AryRezvani
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The isotope 239Pu has a half-life of 24,100 years. After 10,000 years, a sample of the isotope is reduced 1.6 grams. What was the intial size of the same (in grams)? How large was the sample after the first 1,000 years. Round your answer to four decimal places.

Homework Equations



A=Aoert

The Attempt at a Solution



Intially, for the value of A, I subbed in "Ao-1.6" and then did the following:

Ao-1.6=Aoer10,000

Divided each side by Ao, and then take the Ln of both sides.

That's where I get stuck. My calculator is indicating that it's not possible to take the Ln of a negative number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get a negative number after your algebraic manipulation?
 
SteamKing said:
How did you get a negative number after your algebraic manipulation?

The final isotope is the initial mass - 1.6.

When you divide by Ao, the negative stays there, right?
 
AryRezvani said:
The final isotope is the initial mass - 1.6.

When you divide by Ao, the negative stays there, right?

You'd better show your algebra, exactly. You seem to be making an elementary mistake.
 
It's not clear (to me) what you're solving for. What is r? Since you're given a half-life, shouldn't there be a power of two involved? And a negative power of two at that.
 
You might find it easier to solve for the exponential part, THEN just gather the A0 together on one side (and yes, don't forget that the equation should be A0-1.6 = A0e-rt/ln2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K