Isotropic Radiation Propagation Patterns

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on plotting radio wave propagation from an isotropic antenna, with the user struggling to achieve the expected spherical distribution of power. They are using the equation ReceivedPower(RxP) = TransmitPower(TxP) - FreeSpaceLoss(FSL) but are observing a spike in power at the center, rather than a uniform distribution. The user clarifies that they have not included gain in their calculations, assuming it to be equal for both transmitter and receiver. They express confusion over the expected 3D spherical pattern versus their output resembling a 1/R^2 function. Ultimately, they believe their equations and graphs are correct, highlighting the distinction between isotropic propagation and the actual power distribution.
SYS_eng
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to plot a radio wave propagation plot of an isotropic antenna. I've found a collection of equations that I've tried to use, but the results that I'm getting, aren't exactly what I expect (not a circle or sphere, since the power is equally distributed).

Here is the equation that I'm currently using.
ReceivedPower(RxP) = TransmitPower(TxP) - FreeSpaceLoss(FSL)

Receive gain is equal to the transmit gain, which is equal to 1 or 0dB.

FSL = -27.55 dB + 20*log[frequency(MHz)] + 20*log[distance(m)]
TxP = InputPower / 4*Pie*Radius^2
TxP = EIRP, Effective Isotropic Radiated Power


So the only variable that I have would be the distance & radius, which I believe to be the same. All the images of an isotropic antenna power distribution demonstrate a spherical (or in a 2d space, a circle with an intensity radiating outwards). Instead I have a spike in the middle of high power, which drastically goes to zero as the distance grows.

My question is whether or not I'm using the correct equations. If so, is this the sort of output that I should be seeing? Lastly, EIRP generates a unit [W/m2], can is this a valid unit to be using to be measuring dB, or is there a conversion that I should be using?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Typically, you see:

Pr (dBW) = EIRP (dBW) + Gr (dB) - FSL (dB)

where Gr is the antenna gain of your receive antenna, FSL is as you calculated in the equation, and EIRP is the effective isotropic radiated power and is given by

EIRP (dBW) = Pt (dBW) + Gt (dB),

where Pt is the transmitter power, and Gt is the gain of your transmit antenna.

The only parameter that will depend on distance is FSL. When you plot the data, you will need to be careful about letting distance go to zero, as the equations blow up --- they are intended to be used in the "far field" of your transmitting and receiving antennas.
 
[W/m^2] is correct since any "radar/antenna" equation will give you result in this units. Because Radiated power is measured in watts per square meter.

Basic antenna equation states that:
Multiply or add-up everything the has to do with gain and divide by everything that has to do with loss, including distance.
 
Hi guys,

Thanks for the responses. It seems like I'm doing everything that you explained. I didn't add the gain to the equations, because I assumed that there was no gain or loss on both the transmitter or the receiver. Also I was reading on the TxP equation, and the Radius does vary, so it should increase/decrease respectively with the Distance variable. (TxP describes the power at a given distance from the transmitter source).

I've done a bit more work on this and here is what I think I'm getting confused with. I'm trying to graph my plot in both a 2D and 3D space. For a 3D space, I thought I was supposed to see a sphere (http://www.hp.com/rnd/images/pdf_html/antennas_figure6.jpg) , but when I graph my plot, it's more like rotating a 1/R^2 equation around the z-axis (looks something like a pitched tent). If I'm understanding this properly, the sphere demonstrates the isotropic propagation pattern (equally distributed in all directions), where my graph represents the power distribution of the isotropic signal (which is distributed in all directions, but the amplitude decreases as the distance grows). So in the end, I believe my graphs and equations are right. Please feel free to correct me here, if anyone disagrees. Thanks again for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top