Does the Theory of Relativity Affect the Concept of Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Merkur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
Mass is a fundamental property that remains constant regardless of gravitational influence, distinguishing it from weight, which varies based on gravity. The equation F = ma illustrates that while weight changes with gravity, mass does not; a 1 kg mass will accelerate the same under the same force on Earth and the Moon. Some discussions suggest that mass may appear to increase in stronger gravitational fields due to energy contributions from the field itself. Additionally, there are theories proposing a relationship between mass and charge, indicating that mass might arise from charged particles in spacetime. The conversation also touches on whether relativity affects mass when objects move at high speeds.
Merkur
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hallo everybody!


Now I’ve got another problem:

Is „mass“ really absolute or does it depend on the gravity?

(Here, I really think of „mass“, not of „weight“)


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The word "mass" refers essentially to the proportionality constant between applied force and experienced acceleration:

F = m a

Weight is force -- the force pulling you to the Earth right now, for example. On the Moon, a body with a mass of 1 kg will not weight 9.8 Newtons like it does on Earth -- it will weigh less. However, if you apply the same force to the 1 kg mass on both the Earth and the Moon, the mass will accelerate the same way in both places.

- Warren
 
From what I understand of GR, mass is more massive in a stronger gravitational field, because the field equation has a sort of positive feedback. In other words, a mass in a g-field has an energy because it is in the g-field. This energy contributes to the amount of gravitation, which is directly related to the mass.
 
i feel....

before i begin, this is my own idea not any sort of a theory. i feel mass is something that exist when there is a charge. Look at an atom it has charge(inside it) and it has mass. but now look at light, it has no charge and it has no mass. So i feel that mass is something caused by charge in space time.

I might be wrong, if i am please correct me.

-Benzun
All For God.
 
Originally posted by chroot
The word "mass" refers essentially to the proportionality constant between applied force and experienced acceleration:

F = m a

Weight is force -- the force pulling you to the Earth right now, for example. On the Moon, a body with a mass of 1 kg will not weight 9.8 Newtons like it does on Earth -- it will weigh less. However, if you apply the same force to the 1 kg mass on both the Earth and the Moon, the mass will accelerate the same way in both places.

- Warren

Thank you for your answers ... :smile:


But I do know the difference between mass and weight ...

But does the relativity theory cause any mutation of mass, too (when anything passes anything with a particular speed)?


Mille grazie!
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top