IUPAC Names of Organic compounds (2)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on naming an organic compound using IUPAC rules, emphasizing the selection of the longest carbon chain with the most substituents. It highlights that in some cases, different chains may yield the same name, as seen with the example of 3-ethyl-2-methylpentane. Participants express the challenge of finding a comprehensive resource for IUPAC nomenclature rules. Recommendations include using Google for quick references and learning through resources like Khan Academy. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of understanding IUPAC naming conventions for organic compounds.
CroSinus
Messages
32
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Name the following compound according to the IUPAC rules:
001b.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


001bRJESENJE.jpg


Help me with the answer, please!
 

Attachments

  • 001b.jpg
    001b.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 861
  • 001bRJESENJE.jpg
    001bRJESENJE.jpg
    19.9 KB · Views: 1,386
Physics news on Phys.org
CroSinus said:

Homework Statement


Name the following compound according to the IUPAC rules:
View attachment 228517

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


View attachment 228519

Help me with the answer, please!
You select the chain with more no. of substituted carbons. If that gives you more than possible answer, either you apply the other rules (for functional groups if any), or in some cases, it doesn't matter which chain you select. All give the same compound. So, which chain(s) have more no. of substituted carbons?
 
Well, it appears to be the chain number (2), OR (3). Is there a place where I can find all the important rules for naming alkanes in one location?
Thank you for your help.
CroSinus
 
Last edited:
Exactly. And hence, it doesn't matter in this case. It's 3-ethyl-2-methylpentane.
It's hard to find all in one place, though a simple Google search of the IUPAC nomenclature will render you the most important ones. It's better to just learn them as they come across. Still, you can see the Khan Academy videos.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top