IVP Laplace Transform Problem - Tricky Inverse Laplace Transform

jimagnus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
IVP Laplace Transform Problem -- Tricky Inverse Laplace Transform

Homework Statement



Solve x"+x'+x=1, given x(0)=x'(0)=0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Plugged in transforms: s2*Y(s)-s*y(0)-y'(0)+s*Y(s)-y(0)+Y(s)=1/s
Plugged in initial value points, simplified to Y(s)=1/((s2+s+1)*s)
Partial Fractions led me to Y(s)=1/s+ (-s-1)/(s^2+s+1)

I get stuck at finding an inverse transform for the second term. You can't complete the square for the denominator, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You can still do a partial fraction expansion even if the roots of the denominator aren't real.
 
Last edited:


jimagnus said:
I get stuck at finding an inverse transform for the second term. You can't complete the square for the denominator, right?
Why not?
 


If I complete the square, I get the denominator is (s+1/2)2+3/4, and the numerator is -(s+1), and I don't know what inverse laplace transform this would be.
 


Hint: s+1 = (s+1/2) + 1/2
 


oh right, I didn't think to break it up like that.

so you end up with 1/s-[(s+1/2)/((s+1/2)2+3/4)+1/2 / ((s+1/2)2+3/4), which becomes 1-e-t/2cos3t/4-√3/3 * e-t/2sin√3/2

thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top