Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

[timeasterday]

It seems like something is blurred out on just about every photo of reactor 3. Weird - must be just steam at an odd angle.

 

[curious11]

It seems like something is blurred out on just about every photo of reactor 3. Weird - must be just steam at an odd angle.

Reminds me of the blur effect in the Ringu films!

Well spotted, it's a strange looking effect indeed. Unlikely to be steam as it's in the same form in all views shot at different times...

Does it line up with the hotspot in the IR image released previously?

/edit on quick inspection it does indeed line up with the large white spot in the IR. One wonders how far above the temp at white that area actually is.

 

[|Fred]

I forgot to give the full mandatoty credit
In this March 24, 2011 aerial photo taken by a small unmanned drone and released by AIR PHOTO SERVICE, Unit 4, left, and Unit 3 of the crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant are seen in Okumamachi, Fukushima prefecture, northern Japan. (AP Photo/AIR PHOTO SERVICE)

Here is the picture of the drone

As previously mentioned Japanese officials do have picture taken with a military class drone with resolution allowing to read plates on the car..

Ps: they waited 6 days to release the picture as far as I understand

 

[jlduh]

Well, when you say that Tepco chairman is also talking to shareholders, maybe you are right, but again as a citizen, this way of saying things in its first intervention since the very beginning, and just before apologizing by this typical japanese move of inclination of the body in front of the press, creates a strange feeling in my body. Maybe this inclination is for the shareholders in fact, who knows?

And even if this is for the shareholders AND the victims, i find problematic to put on the same level at the same time the shareholders and the victims. If he wants to give a message to shareholders, he can use private means, send mails or letters, pay some adds in the relevant newspaper, or give an economic press conference. The mix up of these things of various importance is kind of strange to me as i said.

 

[artax]

Reminds me of the blur effect in the Ringu films!

Well spotted, it's a strange looking effect indeed. Unlikely to be steam as it's in the same form in all views shot at different times...

Does it line up with the hotspot in the IR image released previously?

/edit on quick inspection it does indeed line up with the large white spot in the IR. One wonders how far above the temp at white that area actually is.

If it's where the hole is to the south of centre in the roof of the building I'm pretty sure it's where the projectile like lump of heavy (concrete) blew upwards in the video and just pierced through the steel girders. this is where some of the steam is emanating.
Hope we can get full res images!
In fact looking at the 2 trails of debris on the roof of the turbine building (one with hole in it) the two lines of debris are almost parallel, suggesting that the explosion came from two sources, or it had two escape routes.
After re-examining... they do converge (Using the white lines at the very edge of turbine building) but to the north side of the building, not where the blurred area is, and the hole.

 

[AntonL]

It seems like something is blurred out on just about every photo of reactor 3. Weird - must be just steam at an odd angle.

steam over water of SFP

 

[AntonL]

So they were moving fuel in/out of reactor building 4

Check the truck in the tunnel

 

[jensjakob]

This is a very nice picture, since it show the number of panels above the work-floor (and the SFP surface).

Now back to the other analysis of the SPF and blowout.

 

[Astronuc]

Depending of the translation he allegedly said that the plant would be decommissioned.. but I guess you never miss an occasion to jump on guns with preconceives opinions based shady data..

Meanwhile I manage to find some other photos from plant released today by A.P.
3 attached and 6 inlined

and some more

Nice. If those service tunnels are on the same end as the SFPs, then all 4 units, 1-4 have the SFPs on the south side of the building and the equipment storage pool is on the north. The fuel handling machines would have been parked at the south end of the spent fuel pools, and unit 4s refueling could have been over the SFP. If there was fuel debris from SFP, it then should be coming out the south face of the buildings.

 

[curious11]

steam over water of SFP

I think the blurriness is caused more by the fact the debris is slumped into the water. It definitely appears more of a blur than a fade although it could just be down to the low resolution of the images.

 

[curie]

Astronuc,

If someone suspects they have inhaled plutonium, are there medical or radiological tests to confirm it ?

Rhody...

Faecal monitoring is one of the best methods, if not the most pleasant. Also urine monitoring & nasal swabs.

 

[artax]

http://www.spiegel.de/images/image-193255-galleryV9-wbmd.jpg

so the hole blown in the south side of unit 4, is that above an SFP or to the side of it?

 

[curious11]

http://www.spiegel.de/images/image-193255-galleryV9-wbmd.jpg

so the hole blown in the south side of unit 4, is that above an SFP or to the side of it?

Looks to be to the side to me...

 

[AtomicWombat]

Nice. If those service tunnels are on the same end as the SFPs, then all 4 units, 1-4 have the SFPs on the south side of the building and the equipment storage pool is on the north. The fuel handling machines would have been parked at the south end of the spent fuel pools, and unit 4s refueling could have been over the SFP. If there was fuel debris from SFP, it then should be coming out the south face of the buildings.

Two photos that seem to confirm this view.

The inside of reactor building number 4 in operation. The fuel handling machine is in the background and the trench to the SFP can be seen leading from the open reactor. The gantry crane is above to the rear.
[PLAIN]http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/event/598/486/75100052-file-photo.jpg

The outside after the explosion that seems to show the fuel handling machine from the other side:
[PLAIN]http://mainichi.jp/select/jiken/graph/20110327_2/5.jpg

The top image is from here:http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8467550-online-breaking-news-nuclear-reactor-explosion/image/75100052-file-photo-of-the-inside-of-reactor-no-4-at-the-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-plant-in"

 

[artax]

Looks to be to the side to me...

OK yes, so the SFP is to the right of the hole I agree, and the steam is coming from the SFP under the green crane pictured in the above post by AW. It would be nice to get diagrammes now of the fukushima plant and rooms/spaces inside reactors 1-4, with an overlay of the outer panels in relation.

 

[rhody]

Astronuc,

If someone suspects they have inhaled plutonium, are there medical or radiological tests to confirm it ?

Faecal monitoring is one of the best methods, if not the most pleasant. Also urine monitoring & nasal swabs.

Thanks curie,

So these methods can detect all radio-isotopes, (plutonium, cesium, etc...) in soft tissue, like the lung, thyroid, etc... ?

Rhody...

 

[TCups]

OK yes, so the SFP is to the right of the hole I agree, and the steam is coming from the SFP under the green crane pictured in the above post by AW. It would be nice to get diagrammes now of the fukushima plant and rooms/spaces inside reactors 1-4, with an overlay of the outer panels in relation.

Annotated from the AP Photos here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3218801&postcount=2012

The red lines have been added as my interpretation of the level of the top floor (reactor access, top of SFP's). Compare damage above and below each reference line and damage to the roof, Buildings 3, 4.

South Elevation
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/SouthElevation.png

West Elevation
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/WestElevation.png

East Elevation
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/EastElevation.png

Top, down
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Top.png

 

[jensjakob]

Hi,

I think there are 3 levels of panels, so the red line should be one panel lower.

When I count on this picture
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=33707&d=1301478930
and this
http://b.bimg.dk/node-images/929/3/620x411-c/3929977-pix-fukushima-vrket.jpg
I get the 3 level of panels above work-floor.

B'regards
Jens Jakob

 

[rasherz]

Hi, long time listener, first time caller. I'm currently living in Japan, pretty far from danger but concerned about the water and food becoming contaminated. I don't want to sound political but, in today's press conference the TOEPC spokesman only mentioned iodine levels (good news because of the short half life), no mention of cesium. Does anyone have an explanation for this?

 

[|Fred]

Hi rasherz , Help from someone fluent in Japanese listening to the Tepco press point would be lovely , welcome to the thread .
I'm not sure that I can answer you question , but I would like to mention that tepco is mostly monitoring radiation in regards to the plants.

Heath related issue ie isotopes found in the air of cities in watter etc.. Is done by gov agency and non gov agency.. So the tepco press conference would not be in my opinion the best place to get info you are looking for.

 

[TCups]

Hi,

I think there are 3 levels of panels, so the red line should be one panel lower.

B'regards
Jens Jakob

Jens:

Three levels of panels where? At the top floor? I think there are two above, but could be wrong. Doesn't change the reference line with respect to comparison of damages above vs below, though, right? More damage in the lower sections of Bldg 4 with much less overall damage to the roof top of Bldg 4 the way I see it. Corrections?

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Top2Levels.png

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/SouthUnit4.png

Sure looks like the smoke/steam is coming from the floor above and the water is being sprayed at that level, too.

 

[AntonL]

Hi, long time listener, first time caller. I'm currently living in Japan, pretty far from danger but concerned about the water and food becoming contaminated. I don't want to sound political but, in today's press conference the TOEPC spokesman only mentioned iodine levels (good news because of the short half life), no mention of cesium. Does anyone have an explanation for this?

Iodine gets concentrated into your thyroid and is mored dangerous and where you have iodine you will also have cesium.

Cesium looks like potassium (thats why you get potassium-iodine tablets two in one) and is distributed throughout your body and like potassium, cesium is excreted from the body fairly quickly

but read about it here it is better explained
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Cesium.pdf
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Iodine.pdf
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Plutonium.pdf

and here is the complete list of all possible elements
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/ANL_ContaminantFactSheets_All_070418.pdf

rasherz look after yourself and stay safe

 

[morningperson]

What's the problem with Tc-99m having 6 hour half life?

It means the Tc-99m was produced within six hours prior to detection.

 

[artax]

It means the Tc-99m was produced within six hours prior to detection.

sorry but it doesn't, it could have been produced up to many times the half life ago. it depends on your detectio limit and amount produced.
basically if 1kg was produced after 6hrs there'd be 1/2kg, then after six more 1/4 after 6more 1/8.
so after x half lives there's 1/(2^x) where ^ means to the power.

 

[rasherz]

Hi rasherz , Help from someone fluent in Japanese listening to the Tepco press point would be lovely , welcome to the thread .
I'm not sure that I can answer you question , but I would like to mention that tepco is mostly monitoring radiation in regards to the plants.

Heath related issue ie isotopes found in the air of cities in watter etc.. Is done by gov agency and non gov agency.. So the tepco press conference would not be in my opinion the best place to get info you are looking for.

I'm just living here, my Japanese is ok, but the technical vocabulary is a bit difficult to follow. Also to be honest, I'm getting better information from here. My wife is Japanese and I'm giving her updates based on what's on this forum, well ahead of the news. There's still a lot of smoke and mirrors going on. No mention on TV about the smoke coming from the second plant 12 kms south, as far as I know. It's hard to decide what's just sensationalism in the western media and what is being spoon fed to us by TOEPC a few days late. So far so good with this forum.
Thanks guys.

 

[jensjakob]

Jens:

Three levels of panels where? At the top floor? I think there are two above, but could be wrong. Doesn't change the reference line with respect to comparison of damages above vs below, though, right? More damage in the lower sections of Bldg 4 with much less overall damage to the roof top of Bldg 4 the way I see it. Corrections?

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Top2Levels.png

I would say 3 levels above groundfloor. 1 level standing on the west-side, 2 levels fallen to the ground.

Am searching all I can for pictures from inside - that can give the clues.

This picture shows 3 levels of panels, but it looks like it is a different construction (lighter) then #3 :-(
http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/03/14/74158-fukushima-daiichi-reactor.jpg

Allthough this image:
http://www.pmw.de/pm_online/data/PCP_deutsche-betonpumpe-fukushima-504x378.jpg
could support the theory that there are only 2 levels above the refueling deck

 

[artax]

yes unit one, the first to explode was smaller output and different wall design by the looks of things, where have they removed panels of unit 2 to avoid a future explosion like the others? is it the one in the side, quite low down? emanating steam? and is it above the fuel pool?

 

[TCups]

I would say 3 levels above groundfloor. 1 level standing on the west-side, 2 levels fallen to the ground.

Am searching all I can for pictures from inside - that can give the clues.

This picture shows 3 levels of panels, but it looks like it is a different construction (lighter) then #3 :-(
http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/03/14/74158-fukushima-daiichi-reactor.jpg

Jens:

I believe Units 3, 4 have two levels of concrete columns, reinforced, to bear the weight of the overhead crane. At 3, the north end wall has collapsed, and the crane fell below. I believe the original square hole on the north face of Bldg 4 was below the level of the reactor access floor.

 

[Astronuc]

Two panels sit above the reactor service floor according to https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3193009&postcount=305 (AtomicWombat, page 20, post #305). See also the ridge at the bottom of the two panels.

See also images:

Tcups, page 21, #330
various on page 23
jinxdone, page 24, #381
Tcups, page 29, #463

The third set of panels sit below the ridge and below the reactor service floor. A blast out at the third level could mean damage to the SFP.

 

[Gilles]

sorry but it doesn't, it could have been produced up to many times the half life ago. it depends on your detectio limit and amount produced.
basically if 1kg was produced after 6hrs there'd be 1/2kg, then after six more 1/4 after 6more 1/8.
so after x half lives there's 1/(2^x) where ^ means to the power.

and as I said it is a daughter nuclide of Mo-99, which has a longer half-life (66 h) so actually it rather tracks the presence of its parent. But still 66 h is a rather short period compared to 20 days.

 

[artax]

there's some reasonable reactor workings animation here, doesn't really explain where the H2 explosions were though!
still pretty useful stuff.

http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2011/03/world/interactive.nuclear.japan/index.html

oh, and I think you can ignore the cyclical behaviour of radiation in the dose/time graph!

 

[DrDu]

It means the Tc-99m was produced within six hours prior to detection.

No, it doesn't because Tc 99m is formed in the decay of Mo 99, which has about 3 days half-life time (I ignore whether Mo 99 has some other long lived precursor). Gilles pointed that out, too, in a mail which overlapped mine. After 20 days there will still be about 0.6 % of Mo99 be left, which is enough to produce large quantities of Tc.

Edit: Seems Gilles was again faster than I :-)

 

[AntonL]

No, it doesn't because Tc 99m is formed in the decay of Mo 99, which has about 3 days half-life time (I ignore whether Mo 99 has some other long lived precursor). Gilles pointed that out, too, in a mail which overlapped mine. After 20 days there will still be about 0.6 % of Mo99 be left, which is enough to produce large quantities of Tc.

Edit: Seems Gilles was again faster than I :-)

After 20 days there will still be about 0.6 % of Mo99 be left, which is enough to produce large quantities of Tc. hey thanks for this explanation, this now clears many things in my mind

 

[artax]

Yes,me too thanks DRdu !, I haven't done much with understanding grow and decay of daughter products!

 

[Astronuc]

Hi, long time listener, first time caller. I'm currently living in Japan, pretty far from danger but concerned about the water and food becoming contaminated. I don't want to sound political but, in today's press conference the TOEPC spokesman only mentioned iodine levels (good news because of the short half life), no mention of cesium. Does anyone have an explanation for this?

Iodine is a concern because of the uptake to the thyroid gland which is pretty sensitive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyroid

I'm not sure about the pancreas.

Cs would also be important to know.

The further away from Fukushima, the lower the risk of contamination. The winds (jet stream) tend to blow west to east, but there are times when they can north or south, and a little bit westward, i.e., NNW or SSW.

I would expect that the other plants, e.g., Tohoku Electric's Onagawa and Higashidori plants are monitoring activity to the north, and JAPCO's Tokai plants to the south. What do they report?

 

[liamdavis]

Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is that pure water does not become radioactive. Rather, it emits radioactivity from material that is suspended or in solution in it. Hence the steam in the turbine, having recently been in the reactor, presents no radiological safety problem. That this is accomplished by the action of a “water polisher” employing HEPA and carbon filters in the primary (RV) coolant loop.

Where I am leading is that the polishing units in the plants may be inoperable and, if operable, may be in an environment where they cannot safely be serviced. However, the function of a water polisher could be employed outside of the plant to separate radioactive material from the water in the trench and from water they are proposing to store in tanks at a remote location on site. These tanks are described as being piped to each of the buildings for temporary water storage.

My thought is to employ one or several water polishing units to separate the non-radioactive water and dispose of it in the sea. This would lessen the difficulty caused by finite storage capacity and allow more discretionary use of water for cooling. It could later be employed in the remediation of ground water at the test wells used for sampling.

More when I have had some sleep.
liam

 

[artax]

wonder how many picrutes that bloody drone's taken, and how many have been released to the 'general public' who just don't understand these things and will panic!
I want to see more, where's that Assange bloke when you need him!

 

[artax]

Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is that pure water does not become radioactive. Rather, it emits radioactivity from material that is suspended or in solution in it. Hence the steam in the turbine, having recently been in the reactor, presents no radiological safety problem. That this is accomplished by the action of a “water polisher” employing HEPA and carbon filters in the primary (RV) coolant loop.

Where I am leading is that the polishing units in the plants may be inoperable and, if operable, may be in an environment where they cannot safely be serviced. However, the function of a water polisher could be employed outside of the plant to separate radioactive material from the water in the trench and from water they are proposing to store in tanks at a remote location on site. These tanks are described as being piped to each of the buildings for temporary water storage.

My thought is to employ one or several water polishing units to separate the non-radioactive water and dispose of it in the sea. This would lessen the difficulty caused by finite storage capacity and allow more discretionary use of water for cooling. It could later be employed in the remediation of ground water at the test wells used for sampling.

More when I have had some sleep. liam

I'm pretty sure it's not just suspended solids that become radioactive, it's any soluble ions too which is why de ionised water is used.
However I'm pretty sure the 'polishers' will be ion exchange filters or resins and will be able to 'remove' the majority of radiation from the water.

The problem is the collection of the water after it's been pumped into the building,... beacuse like the missing fuel at chernobyl... they've no idea where it's going as there's no seals/containment anymore!

 

[jensjakob]

On the drone pictures, I can't find the "fuel rods" that was pointed out on the ground by TCups in the early image analysis.

Meaning either I can't see them, or they have been moved - meaning that someone knows what they were.

 

[TCups]

BEFORE & AFTER
(just for grins)
The before from : DigitalGlobe.com
The after from post #2009, as referenced by Fred

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/BeforeAfter.jpg

Comments:

@Jens:
I can't place much significance to the white rods (what ever they are) detailed in the first helicopter fly by vs not seeing them well in the satellite and drone images. The speculation that they could be loose fuel rods ejected from SFP3 has not been substantiated.

@Astronuc:
Thanks for confirmation - two tiers of concrete columns frame the reactor access floor at the top of Bldg 3, 4. Damage to the SFP4 below the level of the reactor access floor (ie, out the side or bottom of SFP4) and into the lower levels of Bldg 4 might be one explanation to the apparent intensity of the explosion in the lower floors. As has been suggested by another poster (JoeN?), in a cold shutdown with fuel removed, a lot of heavy doors otherwise closed during operation may have been left open.

 

[rasherz]

Iodine is a concern because of the uptake to the thyroid gland which is pretty sensitive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thyroid

I'm not sure about the pancreas.

Cs would also be important to know.

The further away from Fukushima, the lower the risk of contamination. The winds (jet stream) tend to blow west to east, but there are times when they can north or south, and a little bit westward, i.e., NNW or SSW.

I would expect that the other plants, e.g., Tohoku Electric's Onagawa and Higashidori plants are monitoring activity to the north, and JAPCO's Tokai plants to the south. What do they report?

I'm living NNW from the plant, but still in a safe area, way up North. It's not really a short-term concern for me. My worries are that most food processing occurs in the industrial heartland of Japan, near Tokyo. The nearby prefectures supply most of the domestically grown food for these products. Without accurate levels of Cs being made available I feel like we're being (lied to) held back from information that might be important when grocery shopping. Perhaps I'm overreacting, but Topec has a history of doing this.

 

[Astronuc]

Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is that pure water does not become radioactive. Rather, it emits radioactivity from material that is suspended or in solution in it. Hence the steam in the turbine, having recently been in the reactor, presents no radiological safety problem. That this is accomplished by the action of a “water polisher” employing HEPA and carbon filters in the primary (RV) coolant loop.

Where I am leading is that the polishing units in the plants may be inoperable and, if operable, may be in an environment where they cannot safely be serviced. However, the function of a water polisher could be employed outside of the plant to separate radioactive material from the water in the trench and from water they are proposing to store in tanks at a remote location on site. These tanks are described as being piped to each of the buildings for temporary water storage.

My thought is to employ one or several water polishing units to separate the non-radioactive water and dispose of it in the sea. This would lessen the difficulty caused by finite storage capacity and allow more discretionary use of water for cooling. It could later be employed in the remediation of ground water at the test wells used for sampling.

More when I have had some sleep.
liam

Actually, the hydrogen in the water can absorb a neutron and become deuterium, and some deuterium can absorb a neutron and become tritium. Leaking (cracked) control blades also release some tritium.

There are filters (resin beds, not HEPA filters) in the reactor water and feedwater clean up systems. Without power to the feedwater pumps and recirculation systems, which may be damaged (if the drywell is flooded then the recirculation pumps are underwater (seawater)), then I would expect that the filtering is not working - at least not properly or efficiently if at all.

 

[TCups]

Two panels sit above the reactor service floor according to https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3193009&postcount=305 (AtomicWombat, page 20, post #305). See also the ridge at the bottom of the two panels.

See also images:

Tcups, page 21, #330
various on page 23
jinxdone, page 24, #381
Tcups, page 29, #463

The third set of panels sit below the ridge and below the reactor service floor. A blast out at the third level could mean damage to the SFP.

@Astronuc:

SOUTH FACE BLDG 4

See image:
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/SouthUnit4.png

With reference to the visible external ridge on Bldg's 1-4 at the level of the reactor access floor, part of that ridge is clearly visible on this image of the south face, Bldg 4. With that as a reference point, it seems to me that the visible damage below that ridge may extend two floors below the ridge (?), and that the depth of the damage below the ridge would be consistent with the depth of the SFP4. Again, not confirmed, but perhaps suggested by the images.

Is there a separate pool (new fuel?) to the west of the larger SFP, and are the intact walls below the ridge at the SE corner indicative of an intact exterior at the level of SFP4?

 

[artax]

Nice. If those service tunnels are on the same end as the SFPs, then all 4 units, 1-4 have the SFPs on the south side of the building and the equipment storage pool is on the north. The fuel handling machines would have been parked at the south end of the spent fuel pools, and unit 4s refueling could have been over the SFP. If there was fuel debris from SFP, it then should be coming out the south face of the buildings.

Interesting as the stuff at 55 seconds on this (re uploaded vid) that I thought was fuel rods has come from the north side of the building. And so could be from the 'equipment pool'



Amazing how much more sense the video means after a bit of site analysis (On here over these past few weeks)

 

[TCups]

Obviously, the are spraying water into something that they believe to be at least a partially intact SFP4 at the SE corner of Bldg 4. If the SFP4 were breeched, then wouldn't some of that water just be pouring out of that big hole in the side of the building?

Another interpretation might be that the heavily reinforced SFP4 shielded a blast originating from the level below reactor access floor above, and that the blast instead, exited to the west side of an intact SFP.

Which returns one to the original question: What was the origin of the component of the blast at the lower level(s).

What about the equipment pool and the NE corner of Bldg. 4? No teams spraying water here. Annotated image again from Fred's post.

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Bldg4NEcorner.png

And my original annotated image of the north face of Bldg 4.

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/r735227_5964756.jpg

Have we now come the full circle, back to the infamous "Tongue"?

 

[Joe Neubarth]

If it's where the hole is to the south of centre in the roof of the building I'm pretty sure it's where the projectile like lump of heavy (concrete) blew upwards in the video and just pierced through the steel girders. this is where some of the steam is emanating.
Hope we can get full res images!
In fact looking at the 2 trails of debris on the roof of the turbine building (one with hole in it) the two lines of debris are almost parallel, suggesting that the explosion came from two sources, or it had two escape routes.
After re-examining... they do converge (Using the white lines at the very edge of turbine building) but to the north side of the building, not where the blurred area is, and the hole.

The biggest thing that was blown up into the sky in the Reactor Three explosion appeared to fall close to the tower (i.e. landside as opposed to oceanside). I think it landed in the middle of one of the small outlier buildings two spots over from the Tower. Whatever that Large Object was, I am willing to bet that it will tell the story of what caused the explosion. that was a heck of a lot of BROWN Dust for a steam explosion.

 

[Astronuc]

I'll comment later to the last few questions.

Meanwhile, based on a paper I just received, there are about 63 elements in the set of fission products of LWR fuel. Some are in extremely minute quantities.

The key elements of interest are:

U, Pu, (Np, Am, Cm)=f(BU) = fuel and transuranic elements (not fission products)

fission products:
Zr, Xe, Mo, Ce, Ru, Nd
Sr, Cs, Ba, La, Y, Tc, Pr
Rb, Te, Pd, I, Rh

Some are more significant radiologically or mobility-wise (Xe, Kr, I, Cs, . . . )

more later

 

[TCups]

The biggest thing that was blown up into the sky in the Reactor Three explosion appeared to fall close to the tower (i.e. landside as opposed to oceanside). I think it landed in the middle of one of the small outlier buildings two spots over from the Tower. Whatever that Large Object was, I am willing to bet that it will tell the story of what caused the explosion. that was a heck of a lot of BROWN Dust for a steam explosion.

Joe:

I looked very carefully at the earlier frames from the helicopter fly over as well as the satellite images. These are the two largest pieces of debris I could identify that were obviously out of place (arrows). I take them to be pieces of the roof of one of the buildings, perhaps from the large vertical blast at Bldg 3. Who knows?

Image from DigitalGlobe.com with my annotation.

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/LgDebris.png

 

[artax]

Yes, I don't think that was a hydrogen explosion, well it was entirely different to the first explosion...I guessed that thing that went up and stayed partially intact was the missile protection PLUG for the reactor pressure vessel. in semicircles, 8 of them in total. which would suggest explosion inside concrete containment. Anyway yes there was an enormous amount of brown stuff went up, and went up a long way... like three times the height of the chimney stacks.
Haven't analysed exactly where the majority of it landed but would like to see the result in these better images.

 

[artax]

Joe:

I looked very carefully at the earlier frames from the helicopter fly over as well as the satellite images. These are the two largest pieces of debris I could identify that were obviously out of place (arrows). I take them to be pieces of the roof of one of the buildings, perhaps from the large vertical blast at Bldg 3. Who knows?

Image from DigitalGlobe.com with my annotation.

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/LgDebris.png

The thing is they look quite large but not massive... as in heavy, i think for something to be in one piece like that after dropping from a great height it must be quite light in weight.
I'm pretty sure the concrete that didn't disintegrate immediately post explosion disintegrated on impact with the ground.
Anyone know how high the reactor biuldings and exhaust towers are?

Just found a new source of info updates, don't have time to read now, back tomorrow.

http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html