Jets speeding up earths rotaion

  • Thread starter Thread starter way2slo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential impact of jet landings on Earth's rotation. It suggests that while jets landing in the same direction might seem to affect rotational speed, the overall effect is negligible. The force exerted during takeoff is primarily against the atmosphere, while landing involves greater ground friction, balancing out the forces. Participants agree that jets operating within Earth's atmosphere do not significantly alter its rotation. Ultimately, any meaningful effect would require jets to leave the atmosphere entirely.
way2slo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I don't know where to put this. But I was thinking about the force of a jet landing (actually stopping using the brakes) Is it possible that if all jets landed the same direction could it slow down or speed up the Earth's rotation after time?

Because a jet using thrust to take off I don't think there would be as much effect on force or friction on the tires as would stopping.. I always think of stupid stuff like this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as the jets don't leave the atmosphere, the whole Earth and all jets on it can be considered a closed system. There's no need to look at the details to prove it.
 
Although it's true that the tires would not experience as much friction during takeoff as during landing, the thrust of the jet engines against the atmosphere is much greater during takeoff. So the jets takeoff with little friction against the ground and much great friction against the air, and land with little friction against the air and great friction against the ground. Net result; zero.
 
I would have to agree. The only way it would have any effect would be to leave the atmosphere.

In that case, it is like throwing your shoe when lying on a frictionless surface.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top