Joint Probability of Sum Normal

zli034
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Don't know there are anyone can help me out with this. This is just something I asking myself, not a homework I must say.

Let's define X and Y are 2 standard normal random variables. And random variable Z=X+Y.

For real number a, we know P(X>a), the probability of X is greater than the real number a.
For real number b, we know P(Y>b), the probability of Y is greater than the real number b.
For real number c, we know P(Z>c), the probability of Z is greater than the real number c.

These are simple things.

We also can determine a joint probability P(X>a and Y>b), the probability of X is greater than a, also Y is greater than b. Since X and Y are independent, this joint probability is still simple to know.

What about joint probability P(X>a and Y>b and Z>c)? Because Z is correlated with both X and Y, I don't know how to do this. Thanks for help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can use the relationship P(X>a \text{ and } Y>b \text{ and }Z>c) = P(Z>c | X>a \text{ and }Y>b)P(X>a \text{ and }Y>b)
 
wayneckm said:
I think you can use the relationship P(X>a \text{ and } Y>b \text{ and }Z>c) = P(Z>c | X>a \text{ and }Y>b)P(X>a \text{ and }Y>b)

This relationship is certainly true. However I still don't get this part, P(Z>c| X>a and Y>b).
when a+b>c, then P(Z>c|X>a and Y>b)=1. And how about a+b<c? How do I express this step function? Or there is just no such function exist.
 
Put y on the vertical axis, x on the horizontal.

y = b is a horizontal line.
x = a is a vertical line.
x+y = c is a downward-sloping line from (x,y) = (0,c) to (c,0).

As long as x > a and y > b, x+y > c is satisfied if c < a+b. For those values, Prob(x>a, y>b, z>c) = Prob(x>a, y>b).

If c > a+b, you need to figure in the additional constraint z>c. In this region {x>a, y>b, z>c given c > a+b}, Prob(x>a, y>b, z>c) is given by the double-integral of the joint pdf of X and Y, f(x,y) = f(x)f(y), first w/r/t x, from x = max(a, c - y) to infinity, then w/r/t y, from y = b to infinity.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top