Joule Heating of Metals with Different Resistivities

AI Thread Summary
A high school student conducted an experiment to measure the heat released by Brass, Stainless Steel, and Aluminium when a current of 4.5 A passed through them. The expected order of heat release was Stainless Steel, Brass, and then Aluminium, but the actual results showed Stainless Steel releasing the most heat, followed by Aluminium, and then Brass. The student used a short circuit setup immersed in vegetable oil, insulated with glass fiber, and recorded temperature changes. Discussions highlighted the importance of calculating total resistance in the circuit, as the resistance of the wires and contacts may have influenced the results. The student plans to investigate total circuit resistance to better understand the unexpected findings.
steve1221
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a high school student carrying out a physics experiment.

I created a short circuit in order to see how much heat different types of metals would release when a current is running through them (4.5 A). In my experiment, I tested three different types of metals: Brass, Stainless Steel, and Aluminium.

Stainless Steel 304 has a resistivity of2.84∗ 10^(-7) Ohm meters(AK Steel.).

Aluminium 6063 has a resistivity of 3.32 ∗ 10^(-8) Ohm meters("ALCOA 6063.").

Free Machining Brass 3604 has a resistivity of 5.9 ∗ 10^(-8)Ohm meters(The Engineering Toolbox. "Resistivity, Conductivity and Temperature Coefficients for Some Common Materials." )

I immersed 4 cm of these three different metals all with the same diameter of 3mm into 20ml of vegetable oil and observed the change in temperature by using a thermometer. The container with the vegetable oil where the experiment was conducted was surrounded by a layer of glass fiber to insulate it.

Due to Joule's First Law, which is that Q=RtI^2
(R= Resistance, t=time period, I=current)
In my experiment, I kept current and time period constant.

I expected that:
Heat Released by Stainless Steel> Heat Released by Brass> Heat Released by Aluminium

However, when I actually did the experiment,
Heat Released by Stainless Steel>Heat Released by Aluminium>Heat Released by Brass

Can anyone offer an explanation for this?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Steve, and welcome to PF!

So qualitatively things didn't go as you expected. It happens; welcome to physics in general...

Maybe you did more than three measurements and varied a few things ? Everything reproduces exactly ?

You should also be able to do some quantitative work, which you then might want to share with us.Perhaps then we can estimate if this is just bad luck (within the experimental errors) or really a surprising result !
 
Did you try calculating the total resistance of these pieces of metal? If you do, you will find that the resistance is very small, probably less than .001 Ohm. Given this, the resistance of the wires connecting to the pieces of the metal, and the resistance of the contacts between the wires and the pieces of metal you are testing is probably greater than the resistance of the metal under test. What if you try measuring the total resistance of the circuit to see if this is the case?
 
BvU: Hi, I repeated the experiment two times, but the results were the same.

The Aluminium Wire caused the vegetable oil to heat from
24.7 degrees to around 28 degrees

Stainless Steel
24.7 degrees to around 31

Brass
24.7 degrees to around 27

I tried to find other materials, which would come in the same form, but its really hard, as they are solid wires.

phyzguy: I did not try to calculate the total resistance of the metals, but I realize that its resistance would be very small. I will try to find out the total resistance of the circuit, but as I saw a clear temperature difference in the different metals, I am not sure what this would achieve...

I am sorry for the late reply and thank you for commenting!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top