Joule-Thomson Effect: Understanding the Physical Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter sliorbra
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the Joule-Thomson effect, particularly how internal energy changes during gas expansion affect temperature. It is acknowledged that during an adiabatic process, the change in internal energy equals the net work done on the gas. The confusion arises regarding the initial work done on the gas, which increases its internal energy before expansion occurs. The expectation is that this initial work could raise the gas's temperature, but the subsequent expansion, driven by attractive forces, leads to a decrease in kinetic energy and thus a drop in temperature. This phenomenon highlights the complexity of the Joule-Thomson coefficient, which can vary based on the gas and pressure conditions. The discussion references the use of the Joule-Thomson effect in practical applications, such as producing liquid nitrogen, emphasizing the importance of understanding the underlying thermodynamic principles.
sliorbra
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a problem to understand properly this effect. I understand that during the process the change in the internal energy of the gas is equal to the net work that have been done on it.

So far everything is fine. My problem is with the physical explanation of the phenomenon.
Lets assume for now that the attraction forces are the dominant one.
According to the explanation I always hear,when the gas expands, its potential energy increases, and because it doesn't have any other energy source [since the process assumed to be adiabatic], the source to the increase in the potential energy is his kinetic energy. Therefore, the temperature of the gas decreases from T1[the temperature in the initial region] to T2[the temperature in the final region].

BUT, in the first step of the process work is done on the gas, what increases his internal energy, and just then occurs expansion. So the situation where the gas uses his own energy to expand occurs just after some work was done on him.

So, why does the temperature of the gas can't be increased in the first step by the the work that is done on it, and then reduce due to the expansion, in such manner that the total temperature change is positive?

I feel that all the explanations I've read so far ignore the first step of the process...
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The Joule-Thomson coefficient ((dT/dP)H) can indeed have positive or negative values, depending on the gas or the pressures used in the two chambers. From Levine, 6th Edition, values of μJT can have values of +3 to -0.1 K/atm.

From the same book, the point of a JT expansion is to do it with the same gas at different pressures and build an isoenthalpic curve which can then be used to determine the sign and magnitude of μJT. Then you can use your information to figure out how to do real things, such as making liquid nitrogen, which is, I believe, done via a JT expansion.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top