Jupiter: Gas Planet? Landing Possibility & Facts

AI Thread Summary
Jupiter is classified as a gas planet due to its composition and internal structure, which includes a solid core surrounded by gaseous layers. Current scientific understanding is based on established laws of nature and observational data, providing a reliable model of Jupiter. While walking on Jupiter's core is theoretically possible, extreme conditions such as immense pressure and high temperatures make it practically unfeasible. Additionally, the planet's intense gravity poses further challenges. Various objects, including comets, have impacted Jupiter, but no spacecraft have landed on it in the traditional sense.
Zeref
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do we know for sure that that it's not possible to walk on Jupiter and that it is a gas planet?
Did something ever land on it?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
We can be absolutely certain that Jupiter is a "gas planet" because that is a matter of semantics not Nature.

Have you looked up the internal structure of Jupiter?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter#Internal_structure
... Jupiter is thought to have a solid core.

Our level of certainty about the current model for Jupiter, such as it is, actually being a fair representation of the factual Jupiter, rests on well tested Laws of Nature, like gravitation, and the observations that have been possible. There may be some differences in the details but the major brush strokes are pretty solid.

I don't think anyone is saying that walking on the core is "impossible" exactly... it's just that 3000GPa (3000,000,000 atmos) pressure and 35,000K temperatures are a wee bit of a barrier. If we could come up with a structure capable of withstanding that, there is still the matter of the remaining 12-45g gravity. But there should be something to walk on.

A number of objects have "landed" on Jupiter ... most prominently a comet.
Well ... more sort of ... crash... really...
 
Last edited:
If you really want to learn about it, there is an excellent review article on the structure of the gas giants that has just been posted on the arXiv:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.3752
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top