Jupiter's Equatorial Rotation Period

  • Thread starter Thread starter hfenton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period Rotation
AI Thread Summary
Jupiter's equatorial rotation period can be calculated by comparing centrifugal force to gravitational force, as the material will be torn apart when the former exceeds the latter. The equations for gravitational force (Fg) and centrifugal force (Fc) can be set up as an inequality to solve for the rotation period (P). Using Jupiter's radius (7.14 x 10^7 m) and mass (1.9 x 10^27 kg), the derived rotation period is approximately 7.39 minutes, significantly shorter than its current period of 590.5 minutes. The approach taken in the calculations appears correct, though confidence in the results can vary. This method effectively illustrates the relationship between rotation speed and gravitational stability.
hfenton
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
How would I find Jupiter's equatorial rotation period when it begins to tear the planet apart?

Is it true that if the centrifugal force is greater than the gravitational force the material can be torn apart?

If this is right, can I just set up an inequality for the centrifugal force > gravitational force

Fg = GM/R^2 Fc = (4(pi^2)R) / P^2

and then just solve for P throughout the inequality...

P > sqrt[ (4(pi^2)R^3)/ GM) where R(Jupiter) = 7.14*10^7 and M (Jupiter) = 1.9*10^7

If I do this, I will get a rotation period of 7.39 minutes. I am wondering if the way I went about the problem is right. As far as Jupiter's current rotational period of 590.5 mins, the period at which it would be torn apart is nearly 80x shorter. Any other suggestions for doing this problem?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sounds reasonable, what's the problem?
 
I just am never very confident with my answers. Thanks for responding though!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top