Just joined, not expecting answer to question just how to do it

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ready2GoXtr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A new forum member seeks guidance on solving a physics problem involving a gymnast's motion after leaving a trampoline. The initial conditions include a height of 2.3 m, an upward velocity of 7.8 m/s, and a horizontal velocity of 3.0 m/s, with no horizontal acceleration. Participants clarify that while the gymnast has an initial horizontal velocity, there is no horizontal acceleration affecting her motion. The correct vertical motion equation incorporates the initial height, upward velocity, and gravitational effects, leading to the conclusion that the maximum height can be calculated using these parameters. The discussion emphasizes understanding the separation of horizontal and vertical motion in projectile motion problems.
Ready2GoXtr
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Alright guys, I just signed up to this forum cause I heard from a friend that you guys can help. I don't really want a solution to the problem, I just need help guiding me towards the solution. The problem is...

A gymnast works out on a trampoline. At the instant that she leaves the trampoline, a point on her waist is 2.3 m above the floor and at the center of the trampoline. At that instant, the point has an upward velocity of 7.8m/s and a horizontal velocity of 3.0 m/s. Write equations that describe the subsequent motion of that point and find its maximum height.

All I've got so far (which is probably wrong is): Xo = 0m VoX = 3m/s Yo = 2.3m Voy = 7.8 m/s as well as ax= 3m/s^2 and ay = -9.8 m/s^2

If that is right what would be the function that I plug these values into, and if not, where did I make my error. Thanks for anyone that can get me a little guidance here!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no acceleration in the x-direction.

The basic equation:
x = x_0 + v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2
 
Well doesn't she go 3m/s on x axis, or is there no kind of friction in this problem?
 
well, the only error I can see is the ax=3m/s^2. You have an initial horizontal velocity, but there is no horizontal accelaration. You might want to make use of the formula
s_{x}(t)=s_{o} + v_{o}t + \frac{1}{2}a_{o}t^2
where s is the position, v is the velocity and a is the accelaration.
 
Last edited:
damn... not fast enough at the latex writing yet...
 
Ready2GoXtr said:
Well doesn't she go 3m/s on x axis, or is there no kind of friction in this problem?
Yes, but there certainly are no forces accelerating her movement in the horizontal direction.
 
dmoravec said:
well, the only error I can see is the ax=3m/s^2. You have an initial horizontal velocity, but there is no horizontal accelaration. You might want to make use of the formula
s_{x}(t)=s_{o} + v_{o}t + \frac{1}{2}a_{o}t^2
where s is the position, v is the velocity and a is the acceloration.

so x = 0m + (7.8m/s) + 1/2 * (-9.8m/s^2) ? I am sort of confused how I take the 7.8 m/s and include it with gravity
 
well, if you include the time variable as well as your initial hight of 2.3 m
y(t) = 2.3 m + 7.8 m/s*t + 1/2 * -9.8 m/s^2 * t^2
and the output y(t) will be your height at time t
 
So its basicaly (original height) + (Upward velocity) + effects of gravity over time?
or something like that
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Im getting something like 5.4 m was her max height?
 
  • #11
K i think that equation must be the answer, thanks for the help, i really don't see why they told me horizontal motion if i don't even need to use it lol.
 
Back
Top