Just wondering about x^y = y^x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sink41
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the equation x^y = y^x and its graphical representation, revealing two lines: y = x and another resembling y = e^(e/x). The poster seeks to express this equation in the form of functions y = f(t) and x = g(t) and is curious about the specific line that appears similar to y = e^(e/x). They express difficulty in solving these questions due to their current A-level math background and mention challenges with graphing programs that require functions in a specific format. The Lambert W function is suggested as a potential tool for solving the equation, and there are mentions of using a 3D graphing approach to visualize the relationship. The discussion highlights the complexities of graphing implicit functions and the need for accessible mathematical tools.
Sink41
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
This wasnt set for homework just something i thought up so i hope this is the right place to post?

Anyway when i put x^y = y^x (or also lnx/lny = x/y) in a graphing program i realized that there were two lines, y = x and another line that looked a bit like y = e^(e/x) but wasnt.


So this kind of interested me... and i have two questions:

can y^x = x^y be written as y = f(t) and x = g(t) and if so what are f(t) and g(t)?

Is it possible to find the equation of just the line that looks like y = e^(e/x) ?


I have thought about it a bit but have no idea how to go about solving either question. Any degree level maths will be beyond me (doing A level atm) so hopefully there is something simple that i have overlooked?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How did you put xy= yx into a graphing program? Most graphing programs require that the function be put in the form y= f(x) which is the whole problem here.

Solving yx= xy, or, equivalently, y= xy/x for y looks to me like it would involve the "Lambert W function", defined as the inverse to the function f(x)= xex.
 
There was an old thread about this. One thing you can do is graph in 3-d z = x^y - y^x
 
I used a trial version of derive 6 and plugged x^y=y^x straight in. It only plotted for positive values and went a bit crazy at high values of x and y. I think it was fairly accurate though. I remember putting one of the values for the non x=y line into my calculator and it working.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
419
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top