K-algebras, endomorphisms and k-linear mappings

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the verification that any endomorphism of an A-module M, where A is a k-algebra and k is a field, is a k-linear mapping. The argument presented confirms that if the action of A on M is denoted as xa, then the endomorphism f: M → M satisfies the condition (xf)a = (xa)f for all x in M and a in k. This establishes that f is indeed a k-linear mapping, as it adheres to the properties of homomorphisms and the distributive property. The critique provided emphasizes the need for clarity in demonstrating the equality for all elements in k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of k-algebras and A-modules
  • Familiarity with endomorphisms and homomorphisms in algebra
  • Knowledge of linear mappings and their properties
  • Basic concepts of ring theory as outlined in "Introduction to Ring Theory" by P. M. Cohn
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of A-modules and their endomorphisms
  • Explore k-linear mappings in the context of linear algebra
  • Review the distributive property in algebraic structures
  • Examine additional exercises in "Introduction to Ring Theory" for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and educators interested in ring theory, particularly those focusing on k-algebras and their applications in linear algebra.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Introduction to Ring Theory" by P. M. Cohn (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series)

In Chapter 2: Linear Algebras and Artinian Rings Exercise 2.1 (1) reads as follows:"Let A be a k-algebra, where k is a field.

Given an A-module M, verify that any endomorphism of M as an A-module is a k-linear mapping."

My thinking on this follows.I would very much appreciate it if someone critiques my argument … and hopefully confirms it is OK ...
Consider $$A$$ to be a right $$A$$-module where the action of $$A$$ on $$M$$ is denoted as $$xa$$ where $$a \in A$$ and $$x \in M$$

Now an endomorphism of $$M$$ as an $$A$$-module is defined as a mapping $$f \ : \ M \to M$$ such that $$f$$ is a homomorphism of the additive groups and further, that:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in A$$Now, … … if we identify any element $$a$$ in the
field $$k$$ with the element $$a.1$$ in the algebra A then we can write:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in k$$

and so $$f$$ is then a $$k$$-linear mapping.

Can someone please confirm that the argument above is valid?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading "Introduction to Ring Theory" by P. M. Cohn (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series)

In Chapter 2: Linear Algebras and Artinian Rings Exercise 2.1 (1) reads as follows:"Let A be a k-algebra, where k is a field.

Given an A-module M, verify that any endomorphism of M as an A-module is a k-linear mapping."

My thinking on this follows.I would very much appreciate it if someone critiques my argument … and hopefully confirms it is OK ...
Consider $$A$$ to be a right $$A$$-module where the action of $$A$$ on $$M$$ is denoted as $$xa$$ where $$a \in A$$ and $$x \in M$$

Now an endomorphism of $$M$$ as an $$A$$-module is defined as a mapping $$f \ : \ M \to M$$ such that $$f$$ is a homomorphism of the additive groups and further, that:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in A$$Now, … … if we identify any element $$a$$ in the
field $$k$$ with the element $$a.1$$ in the algebra A then we can write:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in k$$

and so $$f$$ is then a $$k$$-linear mapping.

Can someone please confirm that the argument above is valid?

Peter

I think you should put in more detail in your argument that $(xf)a = (xa)f$ for all $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. This is how I would argue the last part:

Take $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. Then

$\displaystyle (xf)a = (xf)(a\cdot 1) = (x(a\cdot 1))f = (xa)f$.

The first and third equalities follows from the distributive property and the middle equality follows from the $A$-homomorphism property of $f$.
 
Euge said:
I think you should put in more detail in your argument that $(xf)a = (xa)f$ for all $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. This is how I would argue the last part:

Take $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. Then

$\displaystyle (xf)a = (xf)(a\cdot 1) = (x(a\cdot 1))f = (xa)f$.

The first and third equalities follows from the distributive property and the middle equality follows from the $A$-homomorphism property of $f$.
Thanks for the critique, Euge ... Most helpful to me ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K