MHB K-algebras, endomorphisms and k-linear mappings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Introduction to Ring Theory" by P. M. Cohn (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series)

In Chapter 2: Linear Algebras and Artinian Rings Exercise 2.1 (1) reads as follows:"Let A be a k-algebra, where k is a field.

Given an A-module M, verify that any endomorphism of M as an A-module is a k-linear mapping."

My thinking on this follows.I would very much appreciate it if someone critiques my argument … and hopefully confirms it is OK ...
Consider $$A$$ to be a right $$A$$-module where the action of $$A$$ on $$M$$ is denoted as $$xa$$ where $$a \in A$$ and $$x \in M$$

Now an endomorphism of $$M$$ as an $$A$$-module is defined as a mapping $$f \ : \ M \to M$$ such that $$f$$ is a homomorphism of the additive groups and further, that:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in A$$Now, … … if we identify any element $$a$$ in the
field $$k$$ with the element $$a.1$$ in the algebra A then we can write:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in k$$

and so $$f$$ is then a $$k$$-linear mapping.

Can someone please confirm that the argument above is valid?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading "Introduction to Ring Theory" by P. M. Cohn (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series)

In Chapter 2: Linear Algebras and Artinian Rings Exercise 2.1 (1) reads as follows:"Let A be a k-algebra, where k is a field.

Given an A-module M, verify that any endomorphism of M as an A-module is a k-linear mapping."

My thinking on this follows.I would very much appreciate it if someone critiques my argument … and hopefully confirms it is OK ...
Consider $$A$$ to be a right $$A$$-module where the action of $$A$$ on $$M$$ is denoted as $$xa$$ where $$a \in A$$ and $$x \in M$$

Now an endomorphism of $$M$$ as an $$A$$-module is defined as a mapping $$f \ : \ M \to M$$ such that $$f$$ is a homomorphism of the additive groups and further, that:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in A$$Now, … … if we identify any element $$a$$ in the
field $$k$$ with the element $$a.1$$ in the algebra A then we can write:

$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in k$$

and so $$f$$ is then a $$k$$-linear mapping.

Can someone please confirm that the argument above is valid?

Peter

I think you should put in more detail in your argument that $(xf)a = (xa)f$ for all $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. This is how I would argue the last part:

Take $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. Then

$\displaystyle (xf)a = (xf)(a\cdot 1) = (x(a\cdot 1))f = (xa)f$.

The first and third equalities follows from the distributive property and the middle equality follows from the $A$-homomorphism property of $f$.
 
Euge said:
I think you should put in more detail in your argument that $(xf)a = (xa)f$ for all $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. This is how I would argue the last part:

Take $x\in M$ and $a\in k$. Then

$\displaystyle (xf)a = (xf)(a\cdot 1) = (x(a\cdot 1))f = (xa)f$.

The first and third equalities follows from the distributive property and the middle equality follows from the $A$-homomorphism property of $f$.
Thanks for the critique, Euge ... Most helpful to me ...

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top