Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading "Introduction to Ring Theory" by P. M. Cohn (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series)
In Chapter 2: Linear Algebras and Artinian Rings Exercise 2.1 (1) reads as follows:"Let A be a k-algebra, where k is a field.
Given an A-module M, verify that any endomorphism of M as an A-module is a k-linear mapping."
My thinking on this follows.I would very much appreciate it if someone critiques my argument … and hopefully confirms it is OK ...
Consider $$A$$ to be a right $$A$$-module where the action of $$A$$ on $$M$$ is denoted as $$xa$$ where $$a \in A$$ and $$x \in M$$
Now an endomorphism of $$M$$ as an $$A$$-module is defined as a mapping $$f \ : \ M \to M$$ such that $$f$$ is a homomorphism of the additive groups and further, that:
$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in A$$Now, … … if we identify any element $$a$$ in the
field $$k$$ with the element $$a.1$$ in the algebra A then we can write:
$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in k$$
and so $$f$$ is then a $$k$$-linear mapping.
Can someone please confirm that the argument above is valid?
Peter
In Chapter 2: Linear Algebras and Artinian Rings Exercise 2.1 (1) reads as follows:"Let A be a k-algebra, where k is a field.
Given an A-module M, verify that any endomorphism of M as an A-module is a k-linear mapping."
My thinking on this follows.I would very much appreciate it if someone critiques my argument … and hopefully confirms it is OK ...
Consider $$A$$ to be a right $$A$$-module where the action of $$A$$ on $$M$$ is denoted as $$xa$$ where $$a \in A$$ and $$x \in M$$
Now an endomorphism of $$M$$ as an $$A$$-module is defined as a mapping $$f \ : \ M \to M$$ such that $$f$$ is a homomorphism of the additive groups and further, that:
$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in A$$Now, … … if we identify any element $$a$$ in the
field $$k$$ with the element $$a.1$$ in the algebra A then we can write:
$$(xf)a =(xa)f$$ for all $$x \in M, a \in k$$
and so $$f$$ is then a $$k$$-linear mapping.
Can someone please confirm that the argument above is valid?
Peter