Can Sound Waves Make Objects Hover?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaffe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vibration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential for using sound waves to achieve object levitation. A participant, Kaffe, expresses interest in experimenting with shock waves and sound frequencies despite lacking a formal physics background. Responses indicate that while vibrations can make objects move, true levitation is challenging because vibrations typically cause lateral or vertical oscillation rather than sustained upward movement. Suggestions include using a speaker to demonstrate how vibrations affect small objects, but the consensus is that achieving true levitation requires overcoming significant physical limitations. The conversation encourages open-minded exploration of speculative technologies.
kaffe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am new. Please call me Kaffe.

I am a theologian of the Extraterrestrial Presence and my studies have led me to Physics and the Science of Frequency and Vibration. I have been thinking about developing a project over the summer to see if I can get an object to hover using intense shock waves/sound waves.

I am not a physics major but the above has led me to go into the the field of physics... alas, I am a graphic design major and studio art minor :D

Anyway, at one point in my life I have seen an object being hit (preferably like a cymbal) and the vibrations make it move up and down... is this accurate? How is this created... the intensity of the shock waves from the object hitting another object? Could it be possible to have a repelling electromagnetic field and with a wavering object to keep it steady? Thoughts?

Please excuse my lack of knowledge in physics... only trying to understand possibilities.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you can probably get an object to appear to levitate on top of a vibrating object, but really the object will be hitting it to push it into the air. Try turning a big speaker on its side and dropping small objects (rice, perhaps) onto the cone of the speaker driver.
 
The problem with any kind of vibration (sound, light, radio waves, microwaves - even Brownian motion) is that it's two way. Things shake from side-to-side or up-down.
They never go up-up-up-up, which is what you need.

But then, I'm only a human, I wouldn't know would I?
 
I would say, good for you, for coming here.

An open mind is a good thing, learn all you can from this site, and form your own opinions on such "speculative" technology.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top