Is the Coefficient of Static Friction Always Higher than Kinetic Friction?

AI Thread Summary
The coefficient of static friction is generally higher than that of kinetic friction due to the bonding between surfaces. However, there are exceptions, such as when an oxide layer reduces bonding during sliding, potentially allowing kinetic friction to exceed static friction. Teflon on Teflon exhibits nearly equal static and kinetic friction coefficients. Additionally, systems that inject fluid to increase drag can create scenarios where kinetic friction, combined with drag, surpasses static friction. Ultimately, any change in surface chemistry during sliding complicates the comparison of friction coefficients between two materials.
flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
One of our new labs states that the coefficient of static friction is USUALLY higher than the coefficient of kenitic friction. Is this true? If so, for what types of materials is the coefficient of static friction less than the coefficient of kenitic friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Static friction is caused by bonds forming between the two surfaces - sliding friction is both making/breaking bonds as the surfaces move and partly breaking off high points on the surfaces as the rub against the other.

I can't immediately think of a case where sliding friction is higher but I could imagine for example where there is an oxide coating that forms on the surface reducing the bonds and this layer is rubbed off in sliding friction allowing surface-surface bonds to form.
 
I'm not aware of any solid to solid interface where dynamic friction is less than static friction, but teflon on teflon has about the same static and dynamic friction.

By injecting a fluid into ports on a rail, a slideway (do a web search) uses the fluid to increase drag associated with any movement. This creates a situation where kinetic friction + drag is higher than static, and one where the drag increases with speed. It's useful for smooth control of movements.
 
Ok, so you might say that the only way that kenitic friction could be higher is if the surfaces themselves change chemically as a result of the sliding? I'm talking about a single surface to surface contact. Not with any intermediate lubrication as Jeff Reid suggested.
 
flatmaster said:
Ok, so you might say that the only way that kenitic friction could be higher is if the surfaces themselves change chemically as a result of the sliding? I'm talking about a single surface to surface contact. Not with any intermediate lubrication as Jeff Reid suggested.

But if the chemical composition changes, then the question has no value because the coeffecient of friction is between the two surfaces, and a surface has changed. ie. all you would be saying is that the kinetic friction is higher between these two surfaces than the static friction between these two surfaces.

... like saying the kinetic coeff. between steel on steel is higher than the static coeff. between teflon on teflon.
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Question about friction in situation where interface slip occurs
Replies
4
Views
1K
I If frictional force in system is <= us*N then there is no slipping
Replies
7
Views
2K
Why is rolling easier than sliding?
2
Replies
71
Views
10K
B Are frictional forces action forces or reaction forces?
Replies
14
Views
1K
B Friction and Newton's laws in car braking systems
Replies
10
Views
2K
What determines the direction of static friction forces?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Difference between static and kinetic friction
Replies
10
Views
3K
I Direction of friction of each wheel and total moment when a car turns
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Modeling Coulomb Friction for a Moving Point Mass in a Circular Bowl
Replies
20
Views
1K
Understanding Friction and Tension in Static vs. Dynamic Scenarios
Replies
18
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top