Kinematic Equations for Catching Runner A

  • Thread starter Thread starter schang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic Suvat
AI Thread Summary
Runner A runs towards a flagpole at a constant speed of 5.0 m/s, starting 15 meters ahead of Runner B, who accelerates at 3.0 m/s². To determine when Runner B catches Runner A, the distance equations for both runners are set equal: DA = 5t + 15 for Runner A and DB = 0.5 * 3t² for Runner B. Solving the resulting quadratic equation shows that Runner B will catch Runner A in 5.24 seconds after starting to run. When accounting for Runner A's head start, the total time from when Runner A starts running is 8.24 seconds. The calculations confirm that Runner B's equation correctly accounts for the initial distance.
schang
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
okay, this is simple and i feel ridiculous for asking, but I'm reviewing for my final and i do not remember how to do this type of problem..

Runner A runs toward a flag pole at a constant speed of 5.0 m/s. Runner B begins to run toward the flagpole at 3.0 m/s^2 when Runner A is 15 m ahead. When will Runner B catch Runner A?

I know I'll be setting two distance equations equal to each other, but beyond that I don't know what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you come across any kinematic (suvat) equations?
 
yeah, from kinematics:

D: distance traveled (m)
A: acceleration m/(s^2)
t: time (s)
D0: initial distance

D = 0.5*A*t^2 + V*t + D0

if you start your stop watch (t=0) when runner B starts to run, then runner A is already 15 m away. therefore:

for runner A:
DA = 5*t + 15

for runner B:
DB = 0.5*3*t^2

where
DA: distance traveled by runner A
DB: distance traveleed by runner B

set DA = DB, you get a quadratic.
solve the quadratic and the right answer is 5.24 s

So it takes runner B be 5.24 s to catch up to runner runner A after he/she starts to run.

If you start your stopwatch when runner A starts to run, then your time is 5.24 + 15/5 = 8.24 seconds

Just double check my math please. hope this helps.
 
Runner B needs to cover some extra distance so are you sure about the equation for runner B?
 
Petkovsky said:
Runner B needs to cover some extra distance so are you sure about the equation for runner B?

I think he accounted for it with Runner A ( +15)
 
Feldoh said:
I think he accounted for it with Runner A ( +15)

Actually yes, I am sorry, I didn't see that.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top