Kinematics-Boulder Falling Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter SChiO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a boulder falls in 2 seconds, assuming no air friction and an initial speed of zero. The correct formula to use is x - x_0 = v_0t + 1/2at^2, where acceleration is due to gravity. Participants clarify that gravity is the only force acting on the boulder, leading to constant acceleration. The confusion arises from different methods of calculation, but ultimately, the correct answer is determined to be 20 meters, assuming the initial speed is zero. Understanding when to apply specific equations in kinematics is emphasized as crucial for solving such problems.
SChiO
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this but I need help understanding this question...
Discounting air friction, approximately how far will the boulder have fallen in 2 seconds?

a. 20m
b. 45m
c. 30m
d. 90m

Homework Equations



x-x_0 = v_0t + 1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I know this is just a plug and chug equation and the answer is 45m (B). My question is more in understanding the physics behind using this equation...
Originally i used a=Δv/Δt then plugged my found velocity into v=d/t but that gives me 40m, which is not an option.
How do I know when to use which?

Thanks for any help in clarifying this for me! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Discounting air friction, approximately how far will the boulder have fallen in 2 seconds?"

Is that the entire question, or did they give any specifics as the the boulders initial speed? If the initial speed is zero, then you are considering tthe case in which an object has started at some position above the ground. You should be thinking about just as the boulder starts to fall, and what is happening during the fall.

While the boulder is in free fall, what is governing the speed at which its falling?
 
Last edited:
No other information was given. A picture of a boulder falling near a cliff was the only other thing given.

But while the boulder is in free fall isn't it just gravity that's controlling the speed?
 
SChiO said:
No other information was given. A picture of a boulder falling near a cliff was the only other thing given.

But while the boulder is in free fall isn't it just gravity that's controlling the speed?

Yes.what else do you know about the problem?

EDIT: I'm sorry, what your first attempt should have given you is the correct answer as well. you may have just made an arithmetic error. both x = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 and manipulating a = \frac{v_f - v_i}{t_f - t_i} and using v = \frac{d}{t} yield the same results
 
Last edited:
Oh I see...well if the only force really acting on the boulder is gravity that means i have constant acceleration, right? And I'm now remembering that the correct equation for this problem is one used under constant acceleration...
 
SChiO said:
Oh I see...well if the only force really acting on the boulder is gravity that means i have constant acceleration, right? And I'm now remembering that the correct equation for this problem is one used under constant acceleration...

Yes, now if we let the downward direction be the positive direction, then we see that, like you said, a = g.

so the equation now becomes x-x_0 = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2.

so you know that the only force acting on the boulder is gravity and thus it is experiencing constant acceleration. but you also know the initial speed, right?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
matineesuxxx said:
Yes, now if we let the downward direction be the positive direction, then we see that, like you said, a = g.

so the equation now becomes x-x_0 = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}gt^2.

so you know that the only force acting on the boulder is gravity and thus it is experiencing constant acceleration. but you also know the initial speed, right?

As he said earlier,the value of initial speed is not given. Only a diagram is given. So you can safely assume the velocity to be zero. If my assumption IS correct,then the answer is A) 20m/s
 
Arka420 said:
As he said earlier,the value of initial speed is not given. Only a diagram is given. So you can safely assume the velocity to be zero. If my assumption IS correct,then the answer is A) 20m/s

Yes, That's what I was getting at and why I said SChiO must have made an arithmetic error. I just didn't want to give it away. I can only assume SChiO figured it out by now..
 
Back
Top