Kinematics in Two-Dimensions - Explanation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a kinematics problem involving a rock climber throwing a first aid kit at an angle. The climber's initial velocity is 11 m/s at 65 degrees, and the goal is to find the vertical height between the two climbers when the kit is caught with zero vertical speed. The participant initially struggles with the kinematic equations and arrives at an incorrect height of 1.01 m instead of the correct 5.07 m. Key advice includes using trigonometric functions to resolve the initial velocity into its vertical component and emphasizing the importance of drawing diagrams to visualize the problem. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding the equations and their application in physics problems.
RyanJF
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A rock climber throws a small first aid kid to another climber who is higher up the mountain. The initial velocity of the kit is 11 m/s at an angle of 65 degrees above the horizontal. At the instant when the kit is caught, it is traveling horizontally, so its vertical speed is zero. What is the vertical height between the two climbers?"

Known data:

Voy = 11 m/s
Vy = 0 m/s
Ay = -9.8 m/s²

Homework Equations



Kinematics equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, so I know the answer is 5.07m, but I have no idea how to get it.

If I use the equation Vy = Voy + AyT and solve for time, I get T = Vy - Voy / A. Plugging in the numbers for the variables, I get an answer of 1.122 seconds = -11 / -9.8. If I plug the value of 1.122 into an equation for y (displacement), I consistently end up with an answer that's off by over 1m.

Here's what I using:

y = 1/2 (Voy + Vy)t

so

6.171 = 1/2 (11)1.122

Needless to say, that answer is 1.01 m from the actual answer of 5.07 m.

I've been stuck for the better part of an hour, trying to figure out how I can solve this equation on my own. I really enjoy physics, and have considered majoring in it (I'm not the best at figuring mathematical things out on my own, but once I get it, I can apply concepts to virtually anything), but not being able to figure out seemingly simple things like this really throws me off.

Using Google and Bing, I've searched both on here and on other websites for an explanation to this problem, yet everything uses equations that are not at all familiar to me. My book and my teacher have only provided the basic equations of kinematics (e.g., V² = Vo² + 2ax), so all of these other bizarre things completely trip me up.

The equation I finally used to solve the problem, also found online, and was not something I learned in class.

It was:

y = Voy²sin(a)/(2g), with G standing for "gravity", or, more correctly, the acceleration of gravity.

I wouldn't have a problem with this sort of thing if we were given equations like this, but unfortunately, we're not.

I'd very much appreciate if someone were to explain how to solve this problem to me, preferably with an even mix of words and math, rather than all one or the other.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
v=0
u=11*sin(65)
g=9.8

use one of the kinematics equations and get your answer...(the 3 equations of motion that is.)
 
I thought I already explained that that wasn't working...

And my class was never given the "three equations of motion". =\
 
Voy = 11 m/s is incorrect. You were given the velocity of the resultant: 11m/s at 65degrees above the horizontal

Using SOH CAH TOA you can get Voy.
sin (65) = Opposite/11.2m/s
sin (65) * 11.2m/s = Opposite
Opposite = 10.151m/s
Voy = 10.151m/s

You should be able to get the rest, just remember to read the question carefully and draw a picture of the situation, the vectors (right angle triangles of the vertical and horizontal component, and the resultant of those components) are extremely important to draw.

Just as a note The legend said this exact thing, but didn't explain it in any detail.
 
yup, i should have remembered to point out exactly what his mistake was.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top