Kinematics involving two objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ab17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a passenger train and a freight train. The key points include calculating the minimum deceleration required for the passenger train to avoid a collision, given the speeds and distances involved. Participants express confusion about solving the equations for time and acceleration, suggesting that two equations are needed to find the two unknowns. Alternative approaches are proposed, such as using a stationary frame of reference for easier calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between speed, distance, and acceleration in collision scenarios.
Ab17
Messages
99
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A passenger train is traveling at 27 m/s when the engineer sees a freight train 345 m ahead of his train traveling in the same direction on the same track. The freight train is moving at a speed of 5.9 m/s.
(a) If the reaction time of the engineer is 0.36 s, what is the minimum (constant) rate at which the passenger train must lose speed if a collision is to be avoided? (m/s/s)
(b) If the engineer's reaction time is 0.73 s and the train loses speed at the minimum rate described in Part (a), at what rate is the passenger train approaching the freight train when the two collide? (m/s)
(c) For both reaction times, how far will the passenger train have traveled in the time between the sighting of the freight train and the collision? (km)

Homework Equations


Xf= Xi + vt + 0.5at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Xf1 = 27(t-0.36) + 0.5a(t-0.36)^2
Xf2 = 345 + 5.9t

Dont know what to do now. I am really confused
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have two equations. One gives Xf1 (the final position of train 1) and one gives Xf2 (the final position of train2), both as a function of the unknown time to intercept and the unknown acceleration. That's two equations in two unknowns.

Without knowing how it's all going to work itself out, how about solving those two equations for t and a. See if any useful insights fall out.
 
Are the equations even right
 
The equations look right to me.

Personally, I would have approached the problem differently. I'm more comfortable using physical intuition rather than algebra. Transform to a frame of reference in which the front train is stationary see what acceleration is needed to attain a particular velocity over a particular separation distance. That becomes essentially a work = force times distance situation, easy to solve for velocity in terms of force, or for force in terms of velocity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top