Kinematics Issue: Solving Distance Traveled in 15s

  • Thread starter Thread starter GT1981
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a kinematics problem involving a station wagon that decelerates from 30 m/s to a complete stop over 15 seconds. The correct equation used to determine the distance traveled is X - Xo = [(Vo + V)/2] * t, resulting in a distance of 225 meters. Participants clarify that the equation X - Xo = volt + 1/2gt^2 is inappropriate for this scenario, as it incorrectly assumes gravitational acceleration applies to a vehicle's deceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct kinematic equations based on the context of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of uniform acceleration and deceleration
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts, including velocity and acceleration
  • Ability to differentiate between gravitational acceleration and other forms of acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations in various scenarios
  • Learn about the concepts of uniform acceleration and how to calculate it
  • Explore real-world applications of kinematics in automotive braking systems
  • Investigate the differences between gravitational acceleration and other types of acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion and acceleration in real-world contexts.

GT1981
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have (what should be) a relative simple question regarding the use of Kinematic equations:

The problem is stated as:

A station wagon, initially traveling east at 30m/s, decelerates uniformly until coming to a complete stop at a traffic light. How far was the driver from the traffic light, if it took 15 seconds for the vehicle to come to rest after the driver applied the brakes?

I know the answer is 225m...but the solutions used this equation to solve it:

X-Xo = [ (Vo + V)/2 ]* t
= [(30m/s + 0m/s)/2] *15s
= 225m

This makes sense, but why can't one use this equation to solve it:
X- Xo = volt + 1/2gt^2
= 30m/s*15s + 1/2*10m/s^2*(15s)^2 ??

HELP! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does 10m/s^2 comes from in your equation??
 
Hi,

The 10m/s^2 is just the acceleration due to gravity (normally 9.8m/s^2)
 
well, that's why you can't use this equation. We don't know what is the acceleration of the train and there is no reason to suppose it is equal to g.
You have used the equation for distance travelled, s = v0t + 1/2 at^2, but we have two unknowns, s and a, so we cannot solve this problem using that equation
 
Oh, ok, so you can't assume g = 10m/s^2 unless explicitly stated then?
 
I suppose you can't, but it has nothing to do with your question
 
You use g in problems involvng FALLING bodies. A car resting on the road is not falling. Its acceleration is independent of gravity.

You have a PM.
 
A Pm??
 
Better yet, why couldn't you just use DV = DX/ Dt ? That doesn't give you the correct answer though... if you use 30m/s = DV and 15s = Dt
 
  • #10
Ok, sorry about all those questions, I'm new to all this, but I suppose that DV = DX/Dt would give you the roundtrip value of 450. So if you halve that to find out just the distance to the stoplight, that would give you the expected answer of 225..
Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
936
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K