Kinematics of wooden box on slide

AI Thread Summary
To determine the acceleration of a wooden box on a ramp, one must consider the forces acting on it, including gravity and friction. The static friction coefficient for wood is 0.5, and kinetic friction is 0.2, which are essential for calculating when gravity overcomes static friction. The normal force can be derived from the angle of the incline, which is equal to the angle between the normal force and gravity. It's crucial to solve the problem symbolically first, using variables for mass and angle, before substituting numerical values. Understanding these principles is key to finding the box's acceleration as it begins to slide down the ramp.
theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
Can I have some tips on where to start this problem? I have no work because I can see no work to do.

"A wooden box is placed on the left end of a 3.60-m long plywood ramp. The left end of the ramp is raised until the box begins to slide. What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the box after it starts to move?"

This is all the information. I have no way to find the coefficent of friction, no angle, and no mass for the box.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
theCandyman said:
Can I have some tips on where to start this problem? I have no work because I can see no work to do.

"A wooden box is placed on the left end of a 3.60-m long plywood ramp. The left end of the ramp is raised until the box begins to slide. What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the box after it starts to move?"

This is all the information. I have no way to find the coefficent of friction, no angle, and no mass for the box.

The answer is: acceleration = 0.

However, that answer assumes something that isn't given in the problem, and it can make it rather complicated.

When you increase the angle of the ramp, the weight along the inclined will start pulling the box down. Now, the problem here is that typically, the static friction tends to be larger than the kinetic friction. In answering your question, I have made the allowance that as you increase the angle of the ramp, you continue to give the box a slight push. The box will move and then stop when the ramp angle is small, but at a particular angle, it will then start to move with constant velocity. It means that at this angle, the frictional force is exactly equal the the component of the weight along the incline, so they balance out. So acceleration is zero.

If you do not give it a slight push, the object will remain stationary, and remains stationary beyond this angle because of what I said about static friction above. By the time it moves, it will be accelerating because the component of the weight along the incline will definitely be larger than the frictional force. If this occurs, or if this is what is really being asked in your problem, then your problem cannot be answered because it requires explicit knowledge of the ratio of the coefficient of static friction to the kinetic friction.

Zz.
 
Sorry, there is some misinformation in my first post. I had not thought to look in my textbook for the coefficent of friction between wooden surfaces (the homework is done on-line through MasteringPhysics). According to my text the coefficent of static friction is 0.5 and kinetic friction is 0.2 (both for wood - wood).

I can see that I have to find where gravity overcomes the static friction (since gravity and friction are the only forces on the box, it is not pushed) but I still have no clue where to start because I cannot find the normal force.
 
theCandyman said:
Sorry, there is some misinformation in my first post. I had not thought to look in my textbook for the coefficent of friction between wooden surfaces (the homework is done on-line through MasteringPhysics). According to my text the coefficent of static friction is 0.5 and kinetic friction is 0.2 (both for wood - wood).

I can see that I have to find where gravity overcomes the static friction (since gravity and friction are the only forces on the box, it is not pushed) but I still have no clue where to start because I cannot find the normal force.

Well, other than annoying me with the omission, I think you have revealed your bad physics-solving technique.

When you say that you cannot find the normal force, it tells me that you might be one of those students who tend to plug in numbers WAY in the beginning of problem solving technique, rather than going through the whole problem symbolically and plugging in numbers only at the very end. There are many instances in physics where variables cancel out at the end. Such problems will trap students with this kind of bad habits.

Solve the problem symbolically. Assign symbols such as m, etc, to the everything that you need to use. And then see at the end if they don't cancel out.

Zz.
 
I have found that the angle between the normal force and the force of gravity is the same as the angle of the incline. I can find it from here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top