Kinematics - Trains crossing eachother

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohlam12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Trains
AI Thread Summary
Two trains, each 150 meters long, are analyzed for crossing times while traveling in opposite and same directions. When moving in opposite directions, their relative speed is 150 km/h, resulting in a crossing time of approximately 7.2 seconds. In the same direction, their relative speed is 30 km/h, leading to a crossing time of about 36 seconds. The initial calculations mistakenly focused on the time for each train to pass a fixed point rather than the total distance needed for both trains to completely clear each other. The correct approach involves considering the distance from nose to tail for both trains when calculating crossing times.
mohlam12
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
ok so, i have a problem.. it says:

two trains have the eame length L=150m, are traveling in a parallel itinerary. the first is going with 60 km/s, the second 90km/s.

1) the trains are going in the oppsite way. how much time is it going to take them to cross each other?
2) same question, but this time, they're going on the same way.

well, for the first question:
the first trrain is going to take t=0.15/60 = 0.0025 hour to pass an immobile point outside the train. the second train is going to take 0.0017hour. I just substracted 0.0025 - 0.0017 to get 0.0008 hour. and that's the time the crossing is going to take. am i right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:confused:
 
Last edited:
please? !
 
Going in opposite directions, the two trains have speed 90+ 60= 150 km/h relative speeds. I assume that to "cross each other" means from the time their noses meet until their tails pass. That means the nose of one must pass from the nose to the tail of the other, 150 m, then its tail move past, another 150 m a total of 300 m. At a relative speed of 150 km/h= 150000 m/h= 150000/3600 m/s= 41.7 m/s, it will 300/41.7= 7.2 seconds.

Going in the same direction, they have a relative speed of 90- 60= 30km/h= 30000 m/h= 30000/3600= 8.3 m/s. At 8.3 m/s a train will cross the 300 m necessary to pass in 300/8.3= 36 seconds.
 
What you have calculated is the time it takes for each train to get past a fixed point. After 0.0017hr, the second train is just past it. However, the first is only 2/3 past it, as it is traveling at 2/3 the speed. So they are not properly past each other.

You want the time it takes for the back of one train to get past the back of the other. The clock starts when they are nose to nose- what is the distance between the backs of the trains then? If one train were stationary, what speed would the other be traveling at to compensate? You can use these values to calculate the time.
 
yup! I got it! thank you very much =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top