Kinetic and Potential energy pendulum problem

AI Thread Summary
A pendulum problem involving a 3-kg mass and a 1.5 m string requires calculating the change in potential energy, speed at a 30° angle, and maximum height. The total energy was calculated as 24 J using kinetic energy formulas. The potential energy change was initially miscalculated due to rounding issues, with the correct value being approximately 5.91 J. The discrepancy arose from not retaining enough significant figures during calculations. Maintaining precision in intermediate steps is crucial for accurate results.
BrainMan
Messages
279
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A 3-kg mass is attached to a light string of length 1.5 m to form a pendulum. The mass is given a initial speed of 4 m/s at its lowest position. When the string makes and angle of 30° with the vertical, find (a) the change in potential energy of the mass, and (B) the speed of the mass (c) What is the maximum height reached by the mass above its lowest point?


Homework Equations


PE= mgy
KE=1/2mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to solve and get correct all parts of this problem except (a).I attempted to find the answer by finding the total energy using KE=1/2mv^2. I found the total energy to be 24 J. Then I found the height of the pendulum at 30 degrees by doing 1.5 cos 30°. Then I subtracted that value from 1.5 to find the height. I then did 3(9.8)(.2) to find the change in potential energy. I got 5.88 and the books answer says its 5.91 J.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried simply using trig? Set up a right triangle with theta at the vertex of the pendulum.

EDIT* Oh wait..
 
Last edited:
I also got ~5.91 actually 5.908 but w/e.

(1.5m - 1.5cos(30))(3)(9.8)

But it's not actually .2, your difference comes from dropping off those decimal places. Wait until the very end to round.
 
You did it right. Just bad rounding.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The answer in the book comes from retaining more than 2 significant figures from the result of the cosine. That is, the book set ##1.5 - (1.5\; \cos 30^\circ)## equal to 0.2009619##\ldots## instead of 0.20, as you did. Both ways are acceptable, although I prefer keeping more figures in intermediate results.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK I see what I did wrong. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top