Kinetic Energy: .00020kg Bullet vs 6.4 x 10^7 kg Ocean Liner

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the kinetic energy of a .00020 kg bullet traveling at 400 m/s and a 6.4 x 10^7 kg ocean liner moving at 10 m/s. The correct formula for kinetic energy is KE = (1/2)mv^2, which participants confirm for calculations. The ocean liner is acknowledged to have significantly more kinetic energy than the bullet due to its massive weight, making the initial comparison somewhat trivial. A suggestion is made to consider a more balanced comparison, such as a heavier bullet and a smaller ship at lower speeds. This highlights the importance of context in evaluating kinetic energy differences.
Jimsac
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Not understanding a formula for this problem

Which has more kinectic energy a .00020-kg bullet traveling at 400m/s or a 6.4 10 to 7th power -kg ocean liner traveling at 10m/s (20 knots)?

I know that w=fd=mad=ma(1/2)at2) =1/2m(at)2 +1/2mv2 Is this the right formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KE = (1/2)mv^2. Use that to work out the KE for the bullet and the ocean liner, then compare them.
 
Jimsac said:
Not understanding a formula for this problem

Which has more kinectic energy a .00020-kg bullet traveling at 400m/s or a 6.4 10 to 7th power -kg ocean liner traveling at 10m/s (20 knots)?

I know that w=fd=mad=ma(1/2)at2) =1/2m(at)2 +1/2mv2 Is this the right formula?
You can just look at this and see that the ocean liner has much more kinetic energy. It is comparing the energy of .bb gun to the Titanic at full speed! So it isn't a great question. How about a highpowered rifle bullet and a more modest ship moving at a more modest speed :

a 20 gram (.02 kg) bullet at 1000 m/sec, and a 1,500 Tonne ship at 10 cm/sec

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top