Kinetic Energy and Angular Momentum of General Rotation System

  • Thread starter Thread starter slayerdeus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the kinetic energy and angular momentum of a system consisting of five identical particles mounted on a rod, rotating about an axis through one end. The kinetic energy formula incorporates both the rod's and particles' contributions, but clarification is needed regarding the distances used for each particle from the axis of rotation. One particle at the axis does not contribute to the kinetic energy, while the others move in circular paths with specific radii. Participants suggest combining the mass of the rod and one particle for simplification. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly determining the distances for accurate calculations.
slayerdeus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Five identical particles of mass m = 0.30 kg are mounted at equal intervals on a thin rod of length l = 1.01 m and mass M = 2.0 kg, with one mass at each end of the rod. If the system is rotated with angular velocity = 60 rev/min about an axis perpendicular to the rod through one of the end masses, determine
(a) the kinetic energy and
(b) the angular momentum of the system.

I have KE = 1/2*Irod*w^2 + 1/2*Iparticle*w^2
= 1/2(1/3*Mass of rod + 1/2*Mass of particles)*L^2*w^2

What am I doing wrong? I haven't looked at part b yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you using a separate value of L for each of the particles?
 
You can treat the rod as an addition particle with mass 2.0 kg and positioned at distance 0.55 m from the axis of rotation. Since one of the particles is at the axis of rotation, it isn't moving and contributes nothing to the problem. You can think of this as five particles, moving in circles of radius 0.55 m (for the 2.0 kg mass) and of radius
1.1/4= 0.275 m, 2.2/4= 0.55 m, 3.3/4= 0.825 m, and 4.4/4= 1.1 m. (for the 3 kg masses)
(Actually, you could combine the mass at 0.55 and the rod into one 5 kg mass at 0.55 m if that is easier.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top