Kinetic energy of a disk that turn around 2 axis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the kinetic energy of a disk that rotates around two axes, specifically examining the formula proposed for calculating this energy. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings of the formula, its components, and the moment of inertia for different shapes, including disks and rings.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a formula for the kinetic energy of a disk, questioning its validity and components.
  • Another participant challenges the prefactor in the proposed formula, suggesting it corresponds to a ring rather than a disk.
  • There is a discussion about whether a disk can be considered as a sum of rings and how this relates to its moment of inertia.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the correctness of the proposed formula for a disk and seek clarification on the moment of inertia for various shapes.
  • A later reply provides a conceptual approach to deriving energy requirements for spinning the disk, emphasizing that the formula may apply regardless of the relationship between the angular velocities.
  • There is a request for links to resources that provide formulas for different shapes, indicating a need for further information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the proposed formula for the disk's kinetic energy. There are competing views regarding the correctness of the prefactor and the applicability of the formula to different shapes.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the derivation of the proposed formula and its application to a disk versus a ring. The discussion highlights the complexity of calculating kinetic energy for objects with different geometries and the need for precise definitions of terms used.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in the physics of rotational motion, particularly those studying the moment of inertia and kinetic energy calculations for various geometric shapes.

V711
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I would like to know if kinetics energy of a disk with radius 'r', mass 'm' which turn around itself at Wb (relative rotation) and which turn around blue axis at distance 'd' is :

1/2md²Wa²+1/2mr²(Wa−Wb)² ?

With Wa > Wb

Look at image please.
 

Attachments

  • xd1.png
    xd1.png
    2.9 KB · Views: 574
Physics news on Phys.org
The prefactor for the second term looks wrong. That would correspond to a ring instead of a disk.
 
A disk is not a sum of rings ? What is the result for a disk ? I'm looking for a link but it's very difficult to find on Internet
 
A disk can be described as a sum of rings of different radius, but it is not a ring with radius r. Check its moment of inertia.
 
But you're sure my formula is for a ring ?
 
It is valid for a ring. It is valid for other shapes as well, but not for your disk. The prefactor is wrong.
 
Have you a link where I can find formulas for different shapes ?
 
Ok, but I don't find the formula: 1/2md²Wa²+1/2mr²(Wa−Wb)²

I would like to find the demonstration of this formula to be sure it is correct at least for a ring.
 
  • #10
The point was that Google can find the moment of inertia of a ring or of a disc. ##mr^2## is the moment of inertia of a ring of mass m and radius r.

A demonstration I find convincing is to imagine that one is applying the work necessary to spin this arrangement up.

Start with the rod locked in place and spin up the disk to a rotation rate of ##\omega_a - \omega_b##. How much energy does that take? It should be ##\frac{I_b(\omega_a - \omega_b)^2}{2}##. Where ##I_b## is the moment of inertia of a disk or ring of radius r. (Which you can look up on Google)

Now unlock the rod and spin it up to a rotation rate of ##\omega_a##. Because the pivot on which the disk/ring is mounted is frictionless and mounted at the center of mass of the disk/ring, the energy required to do this is independent of the size, shape or rotation rate of the object on the end of the rod. It depends only on the disk/ring's mass. How much energy is this? It should be ##\frac{I_a\omega_a^2}{2}## where ##I_a## is the moment of inertia of a mass at a distance d. By definition, that's ##md^2##.

Having done this, the relative rotation rate of the disk or ring with respect to the rod will be ##-\omega_b## and we are in the correct final configuration. The energy in the configuration is the total of the energy that went into spinning it up.

There is no requirement that ##\omega_a \gt \omega_b##. The formula works regardless.
 
  • #11
V711 said:
Ok, but I don't find the formula: 1/2md²Wa²+1/2mr²(Wa−Wb)²
There is also no formula for tons of other cases. All the discussion here was about a specific part of the formula. And there is a formula for the moment of inertia of a spinning disk. And somewhere on that page or linked pages you can also find the formula for the energy of a spinning disk. Put both together with the angular velocity you found and you'll see the second term of your formula has a wrong prefactor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K