Kinetic Energy of Muon in Decay of Pi+ -> Mu+ + Nu_mu

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
the mc^2 for a pion and muon are 139.57 MeV and 105.66 MeV respectively. Find the kinetic energy of the muon in its decay from \pi ^+ -> \mu^+ + \nu_{\mu} assuming the neutrino is massless. Here's what I did:

Since E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^4 and that c=1, then E, p and m have same units.

E^2 = p^2 +m^2
(139.57 MeV)^2 - (105.66MeV)^2 =p^2
p=91.19MeV

Also consider the case where there is a small neutrino mass:

E^2 = p^2 +m^2
(m_{\pi})^2 - (m_{\mu}+m_{\nu})^2 =p^2
p=\sqrt{(m_{\pi})^2 - (m_{\mu}+m_{\nu})^2}

I feel like there is ill logic here. Comments on my work would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is ill logic. You are dealing with a three body problem. Think four vectors. (E_pion,p_pion)=(E_muon,p_muon)+(E_neutrino,p_neutrino). You can only apply E^2=p^2+m^2 to each individual vector, not somehow magically to the whole system.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top