How Is Kinetic Energy Distributed in a Thorium to Radon Decay Process?

AI Thread Summary
The decay of a 232 Th nucleus to a 228 Ra nucleus involves the emission of an alpha particle, resulting in a total kinetic energy of 6.54 x 10^-3 J. To calculate the kinetic energy of the recoiling 228 Ra nucleus and the alpha particle, one can use conservation of momentum and the given mass ratios. The alpha particle constitutes 1.76% of the mass of the 228 Ra nucleus, which is approximately 4.0 units. While velocities are not directly provided, they can be inferred through the conservation of momentum principle. Understanding the relationship between the velocities of the decay fragments is crucial for determining their respective kinetic energies.
MAPgirl23
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
A 232 Th (thorium) nucleus at rest decays to a 228 Ra (radon) nucleus with the emission of an alpha particle. The total kinetic energy of the decay fragments is 6.54 x 10^-3 J. An alpha particle has 1.76% of the mass of a 228 Ra nucleus.

a) Calculate the kinetic energy of the recoiling 228 Ra nucleus.

b) Calculate the kinetic energy of the alpha particle.

** Here again I would use the formula k_f = 0.5(m_1 + m_2)v_(particle)^2 now I know we don't have any velocities to work with but the problem gives me the total kinetic energy = 6.54*10^-3 Therefore I should solve maybe for velocities first in order to plug in and get the kinetic energy of Ra and do the same for the alpha particle. Assuming m_1 = 228 and the alpha particle m_2 = 4.0 I need help seeing if I'm going on the right track with finding the velocities of the particles or is that not necessary ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: The speeds of the two fragments can be related using conservation of momentum.
 
MAPgirl23 said:
** Here again I would use the formula k_f = 0.5(m_1 + m_2)v_(particle)^2 now I know we don't have any velocities to work
Again, that equation would apply if the fragments remained together, but they don't!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top