Kinetic Energy Ratio/Rotational Equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a system in equilibrium with two equal masses on a rod and a piece of clay dropped onto one mass. Initially, the system is at rest, leading to confusion about kinetic energy, as participants clarify that the clay's motion contributes to the system's initial kinetic energy. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding that energy is not conserved in perfectly inelastic collisions, as the clay sticks to the mass after impact. Participants explore the relationship between initial and final kinetic energy, ultimately concluding that the kinetic energy ratio, Ef/Ei, is not straightforward due to the inelastic nature of the collision. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply conservation laws correctly to analyze the system's energy changes.
Victorzaroni
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two equal masses, each m, are resting at the ends of a uniform rod of length 2a and negligible mass. The system is in equilibrium about the center C of the rod. A piece of clay of mass m is dropped down on the mass at the right end, hits it with velocity v as shown below and sticks to it.

The ratio of the kinetic energy Ef just after the collision to the kinetic energy Ei just before the collision, Ef/Ei, would be:

(A) 1
(B) 3/4
(C) 2/3
(D) 1/2
(E) 1/3

Homework Equations



Not really sure.

The Attempt at a Solution



If the system is initially in equilibrium, then it's not moving, and I don't understand how it could have kinetic energy if it's not moving. I want to write: Ef/0, but that's obviously wrong.
 

Attachments

  • photo-3.JPG
    photo-3.JPG
    9.3 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Victorzaroni! :smile:
Victorzaroni said:
… A piece of clay of mass m is dropped down on the mass at the right end, hits it with velocity v as shown below and sticks to it.

If the system is initially in equilibrium, then it's not moving, and I don't understand how it could have kinetic energy if it's not moving.

"The system" includes the clay, and that is moving! :wink:
 
ooohhh. wow i feel dumb. that makes sense. so its the initial kinetic energy of the system is the kinetic energy of the clay.
 
So Ei=(1/2)mv2. Now what? I know torque is involved somehow.
 
Victorzaroni said:
So Ei=(1/2)mv2. Now what? I know torque is involved somehow.

torque has nothing to do with it :confused:

now find Ef (as a function of vf)
 
Victorzaroni said:
So Ei=(1/2)mv2. Now what? I know torque is involved somehow.

Energy is a function of velocities (kinetic) and positions (potential), energy isn't a function of accelerations and torques
 
Alright... So the new kinetic energy after the clay has stuck to the mass would be KE=(1/2)(M+M)r2? How do I account for the mass on the other end of the board?
 
add it on! :smile:

(it'll have the same speed, won't it? :wink:)​
 
Alright so I have: KEi=(1/2)Mv^2, and KEf=(1/2)(M+M+M)v^2. Dividing KEf by KEi yields (3/2)/(1/2), which is 3, which is not a choice? Dividing them the other way yields 1/3, choice E...
 
  • #10
i'm lost :redface:

what conservation equation are you using? :confused:
 
  • #11
I'm not using conservation, KEf/KEi is what the question is asking for and the other stuff is what you've been saying. lol
 
  • #12
Victorzaroni said:
I'm not using conservation, KEf/KEi is what the question is asking for and the other stuff is what you've been saying. lol

how are you going to find the relation between before and after without a conservation law? :confused:
 
  • #13
So how do i use a conservation law?
 
  • #14
what do you think will be conserved?

(and i'll repeat my previous question, since I'm still wondering …

how were you intending to find the relation between before and after without a conservation law?)​
 
  • #15
The kinetic energy of the clay equals the rotational kinetic energy of the system?
 
  • #16
Victorzaroni said:
The kinetic energy of the clay equals the rotational kinetic energy of the system?

no, this is a perfectly inelastic collision
Victorzaroni said:
A piece of clay … sticks to it.

… so energy is not conserved
 
Back
Top